My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-265
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2003
>
2003-265
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2016 11:26:26 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 6:57:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Contract
Approved Date
10/07/2003
Control Number
2003-265
Agenda Item Number
11.I.2
Entity Name
Sheltra & Sons Construction
Subject
Contract Documents and Specifications Oslo Rd. Improvements
Area
Oslo Rd. and 43rd Ave.
Project Number
9327
Bid Number
5066
Archived Roll/Disk#
3208
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3449
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tMr. Clyde Ellis , July 1 , 2003 , Page 3 <br /> ' � a ❑ KimleyHorn <br /> and Associates , Inc . <br /> • 462 - 13 Protection of Post-Tensioning Anchorages : Fill <br /> anchorage pourbacks using epoxy grout and seal with an <br /> elastomeric coating . <br /> ' Question #2 Sheets A- 10 and A- 11 call for a 3 " diameter PVC sleeve for <br /> transverse post-tensioning cables . Should this be changed to <br /> galvanized corrugated metal duct or plastic corrugated duct for <br /> ' better corrosion resistance? <br /> Response #2 The PVC sleeves for post-tensioning as shown in the plans were <br /> designed in accordance with FDOT Standard Specifications for <br /> Road and Bridge Construction ( 1991 ) with 1994 Supplemental <br /> Specifications , and the 1987 FDOT Structures Design Guidelines <br /> ' (through Revision "H") . Section 450 of the 1994 Supplemental <br /> Specifications (as well as the current version of the Standard <br /> Specifications) allows for the use of alternative materials if they <br /> meet a list of specified requirements . Based on current FDOT <br /> policy, it would appear that plastic corrugated duct would be an <br /> acceptable alternative to the PVC ducts shown in the plans . <br /> Galvanized corrugated metal duct would not be acceptable . <br /> Question #3 Sheet A- 10 describes the pourback material for the post-tension <br /> anchors to be non-shrink metallic grout. Should this material be <br /> epoxy grout? <br /> Response #3 The non-shrink non-metallic grout for filling of post-tensioning <br /> blockouts as indicated in the plans was specified in accordance <br /> with FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge <br /> Construction ( 1991 ) with 1994 Supplemental Specifications . <br /> Based on current FDOT policy, an epoxy grout product listed in <br /> the FDOT Qualified Products List (QPL) would be an acceptable <br /> alternative to the non-shrink non-metallic grout specified in the <br /> plans . <br /> Question #4 Sheet A-3 (post-tension cables) describes each tendon to have 3 <br /> strands with 0 . 6" diameter prestressing steel , Grade 270 . The <br /> plans call for 9 tendons across the deck. Will 7 tendons with 4 <br /> strands be allowed as long as the stress across the deck is 150 psi <br /> after losses? <br /> ' Response #4 The slab unit details in the plans are based on 9 post-tensioning <br /> ducts at 3 ' -0" on center with 3 strands per duct (27 strands total) . <br /> ' The proposed alternative to use 7 post-tensioning ducts with 4 <br /> strands per duct (28 strands total) would be an acceptable <br /> ' GA47035008Tonstruction Phase\Wp\VSLOI .doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.