My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-417A
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2008
>
2008-417A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2016 9:58:52 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 1:11:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Contract
Approved Date
12/16/2008
Control Number
2008-417A
Agenda Item Number
8.H.
Entity Name
Sheltra & Son Construction
Subject
Enclave Subdivision Contract, Specifications
Area
The Enclave Subdivision
Project Number
0816
Bid Number
2009019
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
8214
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENGINEER's observations on the Site of the make any examination to ascertain how or for <br /> executed Work as an experienced and qualified what purposes CONTRACTOR has used the <br /> design professional and on ENGINEER's moneys paid on account of the Contract Price , <br /> review of the Application for Payment and the or to determine that title to any of the Work , <br /> accompanying data and schedules , that to the materials , or equipment has passed to <br /> best of ENGINEER' s knowledge , information OWNER free and clear of any Liens . <br /> and belief: <br /> 5 . ENGINEER may refuse to recom - <br /> a . the Work has progressed to the point mend the whole or any part of any payment if, <br /> indicated ; in ENGINEER 's opinion , it would be incorrect to <br /> make the representations to OWNER referred <br /> b . the quality of the Work is generally in to in paragraph 14 . 02 . 13 . 2 . ENGINEER may <br /> accordance with the Contract Documents also refuse to recommend any such payment <br /> (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a or, because of subsequently discovered <br /> functioning whole prior to or upon evidence or the results of subsequent <br /> Substantial Completion , to the results of any inspections or tests , revise or revoke any such <br /> subsequent tests called for in the Contract payment recommendation previously made , to <br /> Documents , to a final determination of such extent as may be necessary in <br /> quantities and classifications for Unit Price ENGINEER's opinion to protect OWNER from <br /> Work under paragraph 9 . 08 , and to any loss because : <br /> other qualifications stated in the <br /> recommendation ) ; and a . the Work is defective , or completed <br /> Work has been damaged , requiring <br /> c . The conditions precedent to correction or replacement ; <br /> CONTRACTOR' s being entitled to such <br /> payment appear to have been fulfilled in so b . the Contract Price has been reduced <br /> far as it is ENGINEER' s responsibility to by Written Amendment or Change Orders ; <br /> observe the Work . <br /> c . OWNER has been required to correct <br /> 3 . By recommending any such defective Work or complete Work in accor- <br /> payment ENGINEER will not thereby be dance with paragraph 13 . 09 ; or <br /> deemed to have represented that : ( i ) inspec- <br /> tions made to check the quality or the quantity <br /> of the Work as it has been performed have the occurr o the events erer- <br /> been exhaustive , extended to every aspect of parAnFaph 15 . 02 .A . <br /> the Work in progress , or involved detailed <br /> inspections of the Work beyond the responsi - C . Payment Becomes Due <br /> bilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER in <br /> the Contract Documents ; or ( ii ) that there may <br /> not be other matters or issues between the Application for Payment to O with <br /> parties that might entitle CONTRACTOR to be ENGINEER's recommen n , the amount <br /> paid additionally by OWNER or entitle OWNER recommended wit sect to the provisions of <br /> to withhold payment to CONTRACTOR . paragrap 2 . D ) become due , and when <br /> ,1,6@ be paid h, Q�AINIER t GQN1TRAr!TQR <br /> 4 . Neither ENGINEER's review of <br /> CONTRACTOR' s Work for the purposes of D . Reduction in Payment <br /> recommending payments nor ENGINEER's <br /> recommendation of any payment, including final 1 . OWNER may refuse to make <br /> payment, will impose responsibility on payment of the full amount recommended by <br /> ENGINEER to supervise , direct , or control the ENGINEER because : <br /> Work or for the means , methods , techniques , <br /> sequences , or procedures of construction , or a . claims have been made against <br /> the safety precautions and programs incident OWNER on account of CONTRACTOR' s <br /> thereto , or for CONTRACTOR' s failure to performance or furnishing of the Work; <br /> comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to <br /> CONTRACTOR' s performance of the Work . b . Liens have been filed in connection <br /> Additionally, said review or recommendation will with the Work , except where <br /> not impose responsibility on ENGINEER to CONTRACTOR has delivered a specific <br /> 00700 - General Conditions REV 04-07.doc <br /> 00700 - 39 <br /> FAEngineering\Special Projects\Enclave Subdivision\Contract Documents\Contract Documents\The Enclave.doc\00700 - General Conditions REV 04-07.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.