Laserfiche WebLink
d • 1 <br />as soon as the loan is consummated. The County is in no way responsible.' <br />If the Federal Government goes ahead with the project, they will take <br />fully responsibility of corporation, only way the thing could possibly <br />fail, is if the Federal Government fails." <br />Mr. Smith then stated that "one agent cannot bind the Federal. <br />Government" and suggested that Mr. Burks "give a letter from a high <br />department official, stating that it would be the government's respon- <br />sibility to operate .it, if the corporation fails to operate it -to have <br />a -commitment from the Government to. show that there -is some responsibility" <br />Mr. Burks offered to produce such a letter but no action was taken;: by <br />the Board on the suggestionr. It was the Board'€i opinion that the County <br />is not responsible.: <br />.1 <br />After considerable discussion, Commissioner Macdonald moved that <br />this Board give tentative approval to the transfer of the franchise to <br />Urban Development Utilities, Inc., subject to'W <br />1. Amending the franchise by inserting on the 9th line of Section <br />20, the followings "No landowner shall be required,to'hook up or use <br />.the water and sewer services as provided in this franchise, provided, <br />however, if such landowner requests services and purchases water from <br />the Company, the the provisions of this franchise shall apply to such <br />landowneror the land involved, and the above rights in respect to such <br />landowner shall cease and terminate." (This is as requested in letter <br />from Charles E. Smith,dated August 26, 1966, and on file in„the Clerk's <br />office) and, <br />2. Furnishing of evidence that the actual franchise has been <br />transferred and that the transferee furnishing complete data to the <br />Board evidencing that they will accept all of the assets and liabilities <br />and will be held under the terms of the franchise as provided in. Section <br />13 of the Franchise Agreement. <br />The Motion was seconded by Commissioner Haffield and unanimously <br />carried. <br />NOV 23.966 <br />ox 10 PAGE 70 <br />