Laserfiche WebLink
Himanshu H . Mehta, P . E . GeoSyntec Consultants� <br /> 14 December 2005 <br /> Page 2 <br /> • properly close the existing6 000 gallon UST <br /> g and replace the USCI' with an <br /> aboveground storage tank (AST) , with consideration that the imergency <br /> generator fuel supply must be maintained during the tank replacemenjt activities <br /> ( i . e . no loss in emergency backup generator capabilities) ; <br /> • dewater the petroleum-impacted area surrounding the UST and perform <br /> petroleum source removal activities during the time of UST closure work to <br /> remediate the PSH , soil and groundwater impacts ; <br /> • provide treatment of petroleum- contaminated dewatering fluids , withdischarge <br /> of the treated fluids via a temporary spray irrigation system ; <br /> • dispose of the UST and excavated petroleum - impacted soils at the IRIC Class I <br /> landfill ; <br /> • restore the excavation area and replace a portion of the asphalt driveway which <br /> will be damaged/excavated during the UST closure activities ; and <br /> • complete the required storage tank system closure report and: as -built <br /> documentation for the new AST system . <br /> The proposed scope of work for the services described above has been broCen down <br /> into six separate phases (Phases A through D) as described below . <br /> Phase A — <br /> Prehrtunary Activities <br /> Phase A includes project management for the entire project (Phases A through F) , <br /> as well as all preliminary activities associated with bidding the project and selecting a <br /> contractor. Excluding project management , much of the preliminary activities have <br /> been completed . Specific activities include : <br /> • project planning and management responsibilities ,ties , such as correspondence with <br /> IRC and IRCDOH , subcontracting, invoice review , project coordination, and <br /> project administration ; <br /> R050083 /XR05088 — UST Closure Cost Proposal <br />