My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/09/1967
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1960's
>
1967
>
08/09/1967
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2018 9:27:17 AM
Creation date
6/10/2015 1:27:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/09/1967
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Chairman read the foregoing Notice and asked if anyone <br />present wished to be heard. Mr. Philip Bragg and Mr. Alfred Sismey <br />were present and objected to the change which included their property. <br />Mr. Bragg stated he "bought it because it'was commercial property. It <br />is 132 wide and a telephone easement runs through it, to zone it <br />residential just confiscates my property and I can't do anything with <br />He:regtested that.. hiss: property: be: left oiut' of the area to be rezoned. <br />Mr:Sismey• •submitted a.jetter in which he stated a 'change in zoning would <br />devaluate his property, but that he was not opposed to anyone wishing <br />to have his own property rezoned. <br />Mr. Albert Helseth, who had requested the change was also <br />present. It was brought out that Mz. Helseth's original request for <br />a. change in zoning contained only a portion of that area now being <br />considered. Mr. Bragg then stated he would like to seethe zoning <br />changed on that portion contained in Mr. Helseth's original request. <br />Mr. Bragg stated that he had not been notified ofathe:hearing <br />onc.,the'_proposed change. Mr. Bragg was advised that notification by <br />letter is just a courtesy, that the Notice of Hearing had been advertized <br />legally in the newspaper. The Administrator stated that letters had <br />been sent to those affected by the original request and that it was <br />an oversite in sending the letters that they had not been sent to those <br />affected by the additional area included. <br />After considerable further discussion, Commissioner Dritenbas <br />moved that this matter be tabled until September 6 at 10:00 A. M., when <br />' the full Board is present. Motion was seconded by Commissioner McCullers <br />and carried. <br />ThereLbein ;ndoone'present,who wished to be heard on Item #2 <br />as it appears in said Notice, on Motion by Commissioner Dritenbas, <br />seconded by Commissioner McCullers, the following Resolution was <br />unanimously adopted: <br />AUG . 9198 <br />Di IC) '44'24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.