My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/5/1968
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1960's
>
1968
>
6/5/1968
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2018 8:59:16 AM
Creation date
6/10/2015 11:20:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/05/1968
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Administrator reported that the owners of two properties <br />had offered a good grade of marl to the County if the County <br />would haul it. A Motion was made by Commissioner Macdonald, <br />seconded by Commissioner Bogosian and unanimously carried that <br />the County accepts the offers of William Eubanks,. Jr. and W. C. <br />Arthur to permit the County to remove marl from their respective <br />properties, plans for removal and property description to be <br />worked out with the owner by the County Administrator and the <br />County Attorney, with the understanding that the County can take <br />the marl and use it in Road and Bridge Department work without <br />cost to the County. <br />A letter was received from Mr. Russell Davis regarding the <br />use of the stump disposal area near his property on Sundays, <br />On a Motion made by Commissioner Bogosian, seconded by Commissioner <br />Macdonald and unanimously carried, the request of Mr. Davis to <br />close the area on Sundays was denied and the Administrator was <br />requested to advise Mr. Davis that the space inthestump <br />disposal area is nearly used, that the disposal will be moved to <br />another area and therefore there should be no further problems <br />from that time in the not too distant future, <br />The Administrator was requested to advise two property owners <br />that replacement of their sea walls was of no concern to -the <br />County. <br />The Administrator reported that a 48"drainage pipe across <br />Citrus Avenue was clogged and that all thel.efforts to unclog it <br />had been in vain. He reported that it had become necessary to <br />make a cut in the road to allow necessary drainage in that area. <br />The Drainage District had advised him that the 48" pipe should be <br />replaced by a 60" pipe and that the adjoining pipe, running into <br />the canal, a 60" pipe, should be replaced by.a 66" pipe. The <br />Administrator advised that he would remove the 60" pipe first and <br />use as much of it as possible in place of the 48" pipe. A Motion <br />sock 11 PA;4 259 <br />JUN 51968 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.