Laserfiche WebLink
7 . Instrument Calibration — In addition to calibration procedures specified in the analytical methods listed in the <br /> planning document, the GRANTEE shall ensure that the following requirements are met. <br /> a. All sample results shall be chronologically bracketed between acceptable calibration verifications. <br /> b. Initial Calibration Requirements <br /> (i) The minimum number of calibration standards required to calibrate each instrument used for the <br /> contracted analyses shall conform to the analytical method approved in the planning document. If the <br /> minimum number of calibration standards is not specified in the method, the number must be specified <br /> in the planning document and shall be consistent with the NELAC Chapter 5 standards. <br /> ( ii) Unless otherwise specified by the method, all sample results shall be based on the initial calibration <br /> curve responses. <br /> ( iii) If linear regressions are used, the correlation coefficient shall be equal to or greater than 0 .995 for all <br /> regressions . <br /> ( iv) Immediately after performing an initial calibration, the accuracy of the calibration shall be verified <br /> using a second source. A second source may be a standard, a Standard Reference Material (SRM), or <br /> other sample type with a verified concentration such as a QC Check Sample . Standards must have <br /> been prepared from a different lot or vendor. <br /> (v) The acceptance criteria for second-source verifications shall be specified in the planning document. <br /> (vi) Sample analysis cannot proceed if an initial calibration is unacceptable. <br /> c . Continuing Calibration Requirements : <br /> (i) When an initial calibration is not performed on the day of analysis, a continuing calibration standard <br /> shall be analyzed, evaluated and determined to be acceptable prior to analyzing samples . <br /> (ii) A continuing calibration standard shall be analyzed and evaluated at the end of the analytical run. <br /> (iii) The acceptance criteria for continuing calibration verifications shall be specified in the planning <br /> document. <br /> ( iv) For each analytical run, the analytical sensitivity must be evaluated using a continuing calibration <br /> standard prepared at the Contract-specified PQL. The analyzed value of this standard must be within <br /> 70% — 130% of the expected value. If this PQL check fails, the blank and associated sample results <br /> must be reported as "estimated" per Chapter 62460, F. A.C . unless the affected results are at least 10 <br /> times the absolute value of the observed bias of the PQL check. <br /> (v) If a continuing calibration verification fails, samples not chronologically bracketed by acceptable <br /> calibration verifications must be reanalyzed or appropriately qualified. <br /> d. Sample results below the Contract-specified PQL and above the highest calibration standard shall <br />be <br /> appropriately qualified. <br /> 8 . Quality Control Blanks <br /> a. If a Contracted analyte is detected in any analytical QC blank, the sample results that are associated with <br /> the blank must be reported with the appropriate qualifier from Chapter 62460, F .A.C . , unless the affected <br /> sample concentrations are at least 10 times higher than the calculated QC blank concentration. <br /> b. Sample results must be chronologically bracketed with acceptable beginning and ending analytical QC <br /> blanks . <br /> c. If a Contracted analyte is detected in the field blank, equipment blank or trip blank, the result must <br /> be <br /> confirmed by reanalyzing a new aliquot of the blank unless the sample concentration results associated with <br /> the blank are at least 10 times the calculated blank concentration. The laboratory must investigate the <br /> blank contamination to determine that positive blank results are not due to a laboratory error and report the <br /> affected samples and field-generated blank results with appropriate qualifiers and/or comments. <br /> 9. If any quality control measure or calibration verification fails (including those specified above), samples that are <br /> associated with the failure must be reanalyzed, if possible. Sample data that are associated with a failed quality <br /> control measure or calibration must be appropriately qualified as specified in Chapter 62460, F.A . C . An <br /> explanatory comment must be attached to the final report for each result that has a qualifier code other than U, I, <br /> or A . Any additional qualifier codes used but not explicitly listed in Chapter 62460, F .A .C . must be identified <br /> and defined in the report. <br /> 10 . The reported MDL and PQL for each sample must be adjusted for dilution factors and any relevant preparation <br /> weights and volumes . <br /> 11 . Field QC duplicates or replicates - The GRANTEE shall ensure that field duplicates (not to be confused <br />with <br /> laboratory duplicates) are analyzed. All field duplicate results greater than the contracted PQL should agree <br /> within 20% RPD for each measured analyte . In the event that field duplicate agreement is not observed, the <br /> Revision Date: 02/09 <br /> DEP Agreement No. G0353, Attachment J. Page 7 of 14 <br />