My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-065C
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2014
>
2014-065C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2017 11:44:52 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:10:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Correspondence
Approved Date
05/13/2014
Control Number
2014-065C
Agenda Item Number
9.A.
Entity Name
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant
JAG
Subject
Department of Justice Local Solicitation funds Award
Alternate Name
Bureau of Justice Assistance
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
13419
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A TRUE COPY <br />CERTIFICATION ON LAST PAGE <br />J.R. SMITH, CLERK <br />Providing Services to Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Individuals <br />In accordance with DOJ guidance pertaining to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d, recipients of federal financial <br />assistance must take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to their programs and activities for persons with limited English <br />proficiency (LEP) See U.S. Department of Justice, Guidance to Federal Financial Assistance Recipients Regarding Title VI Prohibition <br />Against National Ongin Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons, 67 Fed. Reg. 41,455 (2002). For more information <br />on the civil rights responsibilities that recipients have in providing language services to LEP individuals please see the website <br />http://www.lep.gov. <br />Ensuring Equal Treatment for Faith -Based Organizations <br />The DOJ regulation, Equal Treatment for Faith -Based Organizations 28 C.F.R. pt. 38, requires State Administering Agencies (SAAs) to <br />treat faith -based organizations the same as any other applicant or recipient. The regulation prohibits SAAs from making awards or grant <br />administration decisions on the basis of an organization s religious character or affiliation, religious name, or the religious composition of its <br />board of directors. <br />The regulation also prohibits faith -based organizations from using financial assistance from the DOJ to fund inherently (or explicitly) <br />religious activities. While faith -based organizations can engage m non -funded inherently religious activities, they must hold them <br />separately from the program funded by the DOJ and recipients cannot compel beneficiaries to participate in them. The Equal Treatment <br />Regulation also makes clear that organizations participating in programs funded by the DOJ are not permitted to discnminate in the <br />provision of services on the basis of a beneficiary's religion. For more information on the regulation, please see the OCR's website at <br />http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/about/ocr/equal_fbo.htm. <br />SAAs and faith -based organizations should also note that the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (Safe Streets Act) of 1968, as <br />amended, 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c); the Victims of Crime Act of 1984, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 10604(e); the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency <br />Prevention Act of 1974, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 5672(b); and VAWA, Pub L No. 113-4, sec. 3(b)(4), 127 Stat. 54, 61-62 (to be codified <br />at 42 U.S.C. § 13925(b)(13)) contain prohibitions against discnmination on the basis of religion in employment. Despite these <br />nondiscrimination provisions, the DOJ has concluded that it may construe the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) on a case-by- <br />case basis to permit some faith -based organizations to receive DOJ funds while taking into account religion when hiring staff, even if the <br />statute that authonzes the funding program generally forbids recipients from considenng religion in employment decisions <br />Please consult with the OCR if you have any questions about the regulation or the application of RFRA to the statutes that prohibit <br />discrimination in employment. <br />Using Arrest and Conviction Records in Making Employment Decisions <br />The OCR issued an advisory document for recipients on the proper use of arrest and conviction records in making hinng decisions. See <br />Advisory for Recipients of Financial Assistance from the U.S. Department of Justice on the U S. Equal Employment Opportunity <br />Commission's Enforcement Guidance: Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions Under Title VII of the <br />Civil Rights Act of 1964 (June 2013), available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov//about/ocr/pdfs/UseofConviction_Advisory.pdf. Recipients <br />should be mindful that the misuse of arrest or conviction records to screen either applicants for employment or employees for retention or <br />promotion may have a disparate impact based on race or national ongin, resulting in unlawful employment discrimination. In light of the <br />Advisory, recipients should consult local counsel in reviewing their employment practices. If warranted, recipients should also incorporate <br />an analysis of the use of arrest and conviction records in their Equal Employment Opportunity Plans (EEOPs) (see below). <br />Complying with the Safe Streets Act <br />An organization that is a recipient of financial assistance subject to the nondiscrimination provisions of the Safe Streets Act, must meet two <br />obligations: (1) complying with the federal regulation pertaining to the development of an EEOP (see 28 C.F.R. pt. 42, subpt. E) and (2) <br />submitting to the OCR findings of discrimination (see 28 C F R. §§ 42.204(c), .205(c)(5)). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.