Laserfiche WebLink
Ir <br /> � = r Q91 <br /> % ti <br /> agreed to in writing , the Application for Payment subsequent tests called for in the Contract <br /> shall also be accompanied by a bill of sale , Documents , to a final determination of <br /> invoice , or other documentation warranting that quantities and classifications for Unit Price <br /> OWNER has received the materials and equip- Work under paragraph 9 . 08 , and to any <br /> ment free and clear of all Liens and evidence other qualifications stated in the <br /> that the materials and equipment are covered recommendation ) ; and <br /> by appropriate property insurance or other <br /> arrangements to protect OWNER 's interest c. The conditions precedent to <br /> therein , all of which must be satisfactory to CONTRACTOR ' s being entitled to such <br /> OWNER , payment appear to have been fulfilled in so <br /> far as it is ENGINEER 's responsibility to <br /> 2 . Beginning with the second observe the Work . <br /> Application for Payment, each Application shall <br /> include an affidavit of CONTRACTOR stating 3 . By recommending any such <br /> that all previous progress payments received payment ENGINEER will not thereby be <br /> on account of the Work have been applied on deemed to have represented that: ( i ) inspec- <br /> account to discharge CONTRACTOR ' s tions made to check the quality or the quantity <br /> legitimate obligations associated with prior of the Work as it has been performed have <br /> Applications for Payment, been exhaustive , extended to every aspect of <br /> the Work in progress , or involved detailed <br /> 3 . The amount of retainage with respect inspections of the Work beyond the responsk <br /> to progress payments will be as stipulated in bilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER <br /> in <br /> the Agreement. the Contract Documents ; or ( ii ) that there may <br /> not be other matters or issues between the <br /> B . Review of Applications parties that might entitle CONTRACTOR to be <br /> paid additionally by OWNER or entitle OWNER <br /> 1 . ENGINEER will , within 10 days after to withhold payment to CONTRACTOR , <br /> receipt of each Application for Payment, either <br /> indicate in writing a recommendation of 4 . Neither ENGINEER 's review of <br /> payment and present the Application to CONTRACTOR ' s Work for the purposes of <br /> w OWNER or return the Application to recommending payments nor ENGINEER ' s <br /> CONTRACTOR indicating in writing recommendation of any payment, including final <br /> ENGINEER 's reasons for refusing to payment, will impose responsibility on <br /> recommend payment. In the latter case , CON - ENGINEER to supervise , direct, or control the <br /> TRACTOR may make the necessary Work or for the means, methods , techniques , <br /> corrections and resubmit the Application , sequences , or procedures of construction , or <br /> the safety precautions and programs incident <br /> 2 . ENGINEER 's recommendation of thereto , or for CONTRACTOR 's failure to <br /> any payment requested in an Application for comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to <br /> Payment will constitute a representation by CONTRACTOR ' s performance of the Work . <br /> ENGINEER to OWNER , based on Additionally, said review or recommendation will <br /> ENGINEER 's observations on the Site of the not impose responsibility on ENGINEER to <br /> executed Work as an experienced and qualified make any examination to ascertain how or for <br /> design professional and on ENGINEER's what purposes CONTRACTOR has used the <br /> review of the Application for Payment and the moneys paid on account of the Contract Price , <br /> accompanying data and schedules , that to the or to determine that title to any of the <br /> Work , <br /> best of ENGINEER 's knowledge , information materials , or equipment has passed to <br /> and belief: OWNER free and clear of any Liens . <br /> a . the Work has progressed to the point 5 . ENGINEER may refuse to recom - <br /> indicated ; mend the whole or any part of any payment if, <br /> in ENGINEER ' s opinion , it would be incorrect to <br /> b . the quality of the Work is generally in make the representations to OWNER referred <br /> accordance with the Contract Documents to in paragraph 14 . 02 . B . 2 . ENGINEER may <br /> (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a also refuse to recommend any such payment <br /> functioning whole prior to or upon or, because of subsequently discovered <br /> Substantial Completion , to the results of any evidence or the results of subsequent <br /> 00700 - 39 00700 - General Conditions REV 04-07. doc <br /> F :APublic Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\0845 -Dixie Hwy US 1 _69th (LAP) ROW Mapping Project (Morgan)AAdmim\bid <br /> documents\00700 - General Conditions REV 04-07 . doc <br />