My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-015
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2011
>
2011-015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2017 1:46:45 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 1:30:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Grant
Approved Date
01/18/2011
Control Number
2011-015
Agenda Item Number
12.A.1.B.
Entity Name
Neighborhood Stabilization Program
Subject
Procurement Policies and Procedures
Revised January 18, 2011
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
9156
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The contract shall be awarded to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder or proposer whose <br />bid or proposal most completely meets the requirements and criteria set forth in the invitation for bids or <br />request for proposals. <br />The term "responsible bidder or proposer" refers to the capability of a vendor or contractor to <br />perform fully all aspects of the contract. Financial capability, integrity, and reliability of the bidder or <br />proposer, all of which tend to ensure good faith performance, shall be a criteria in evaluation of <br />responsibleness. The term "responsive bidder or proposer" means a bidder who has submitted a bid <br />or proposals which materially conforms to all provisions of the specifications and the invitation to bid or <br />request for proposal. <br />Evaluation criteria and requirements for bids set forth in the invitation for bids shall be used to <br />determine the most responsible and responsive bidder. A technical review shall be performed on proposals <br />in the following manner. A subjective ranking of bids or proposals by a majority of the elected officials, or <br />by persons selected by the body to act on their behalf, shall be utilized as a method of selection (See <br />Appendix A). Award shall be made to the responsible individual firm whose proposal is considered most <br />advantageous to the program, with price and other factors considered. <br />In procuring services for grant administration, evaluations of vendors or service suppliers shall <br />include a proven track record and sound reputation; adequate financial strength; high ethical standards; and <br />a record of adhering to specifications, of maintaining shipping or service delivery schedules, and of giving <br />a full measure of service. Consideration may also include the prospective contractor's records of past <br />performance under CDBG grants. This factor is not meant to exclude consideration of new firms, but <br />rather, to include past performance and experience as a potential criterion. <br />All bidders will be notified that they were or were not selected for award of contract as soon as <br />possible following the evaluation and decision process. <br />E. MULTIPLE SERVICE AWARDS <br />Vendors or service suppliers will be considered for multiple sources of supply or multiple services <br />when it can be demonstrated that such vendors or services suppliers either are sole sources of the services <br />or are the responsive proposer whose proposal is determined in writing as a result of a competitive process <br />to be the most advantageous to local government. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.