Laserfiche WebLink
Board examined the returns, No. 1 to No. 2166 inclusive and <br />found that with the exception of Nos. 785, 786, 787, 800, 836, <br />837, 2165 and 2166;all of the land described in those returns <br />were used primarily for agricultural purposes. On a Motion made <br />by Commissioner Massey, seconded by Commissioner Dritenbas and <br />unanimously carried all the lands in said returns were zoned as <br />agricultural lands under the provisions of Section 193:201, <br />Florida Statutes. <br />Upon a Motion by Commissioner Loy, second by Commissioner <br />Massey and unanimously carried Agricultural Assessment Returns, <br />785, 786, 787, 800, 836 and 837 were denied. <br />Upon a Motion by Commissioner Dritenbas, second by <br />Commissioner Loy,Agricultural Assessment Return 2165 Was unanimously <br />denied. <br />Upon a Motion made by Commissioner Massey, second by <br />Commissioner Loy, Agricultural Assessment Return 2166 was <br />unanimously denied. <br />On a Motion made by Commissioner Massey, seconded by <br />Commissioner Loy and unanimously carried, the Indian River County <br />Agricultural Zoning Board then adjourned sine die. <br />The Board then reconvened as Board of County Commissioners. <br />The Board decided to consider purchase of a recording <br />system to be used in taking the minutes of the Board at a cost of <br />$599.99. <br />The County Finance Officer reported that an operator <br />would be assigned to the Xerox machine in the Clerk's office <br />in order that the cost might be properly distributed. <br />Gene Morris, County Tax Collector, reported that his <br />office was cooperating with the office of the Tax Assessor by <br />going into a computerized service system of which the Collector`s <br />share of the cost for the first year including the cost of conversion <br />and updating the rolls, would be $9,514.00. <br />v <br />M.Ay 5 1971 <br />