My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-009A
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2014
>
2014-009A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2017 10:57:17 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 5:56:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Contract
Approved Date
02/04/2014
Control Number
2014-009A
Agenda Item Number
8.K
Entity Name
Ranger Construction Industries, Inc of Fort Pierce
Subject
Indian River Boulevard Resurfacing
Area
U S 1 to 17th Street
Project Number
1302
Bid Number
2014009
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
12991
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENGINEER's observations on the Site of the <br />executed Work as an experienced and qualified <br />design professional and on ENGINEER's <br />review of the Application for Payment and the <br />accompanying data and schedules, that to the <br />best of ENGINEER's knowledge, information <br />and belief: <br />a. the Work has progressed to the point <br />indicated; <br />b. the quality of the Work is generally in <br />accordance with the Contract Documents <br />(subject to an evaluation of the Work as a <br />functioning whole prior to or upon <br />Substantial Completion, to the results of any <br />subsequent tests called for in the Contract <br />Documents, to a final determination of <br />quantities and classifications for Unit Price <br />Work under paragraph 9.08, and to any <br />other qualifications stated in the <br />recommendation) and <br />c. The conditions precedent to <br />CONTRACTOR's being entitled to such <br />payment appear to have been fulfilled in so <br />far as it is ENGINEER's responsibility to <br />observe the Work. <br />3. By recommending any such <br />payment ENGINEER will not thereby be <br />deemed to have represented that (i) inspec- <br />tions made to check the quality or the quantity <br />of the Work as it has been performed have <br />been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of <br />the Work in progress, or involved detailed <br />inspections of the Work beyond the responsi- <br />bilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER in <br />the Contract Documents; or (ii) that there may <br />not be other matters or issues between the <br />parties that might entitle CONTRACTOR to be <br />paid additionally by OWNER or entitle OWNER <br />to withhold payment to CONTRACTOR. <br />4 Neither ENGINEER's review of <br />CONTRACTOR's Work for the purposes of <br />recommending payments nor ENGINEER's <br />recommendation of any payment, including final <br />payment will impose responsibility on <br />ENGINEER to supervise, direct, or control the <br />Work or for the means, methods, techniques, <br />sequences, or procedures of construction, or <br />the safety precautions and programs incident <br />thereto, or for CONTRACTOR's failure to <br />comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to <br />CONTRACTOR s performance of the Work. <br />Additionally, said review or recommendation will <br />not impose responsibility on ENGINEER to <br />make any examination to ascertain how or for <br />what purposes CONTRACTOR has used the <br />moneys paid on account of the Contract Price, <br />or to determine that title to any of the Work, <br />materials, or equipment has passed to <br />OWNER free and clear of any Liens <br />5. ENGINEER may refuse to recom- <br />mend the whole or any part of any payment if, <br />in ENGINEER's opinion, it would be incorrect to <br />make the representations to OWNER referred <br />to in paragraph 14.02.B.2. ENGINEER may <br />also refuse to recommend any such payment <br />or, because of subsequently discovered <br />evidence or the results of subsequent <br />inspections or tests, revise or revoke any such <br />payment recommendation previously made, to <br />such extent as may be necessary in <br />ENGINEER's opinion to protect OWNER from <br />loss because: <br />a. the Work is defective or completed <br />Work has been damaged, requiring <br />correction or replacement; <br />b. the Contract Price has been reduced <br />by Written Amendment or Change Orders; <br />c. OWNER has been required to correct <br />defective Work or complete Work in accor- <br />dance with paragraph 13 09; or <br />d. ENGINEER has actual knowledge of <br />the occurrence of any of the events enurner <br />°tad in paragraph 15.02.A. <br />C. Payment Becomes Due <br />1. Ten days after presentation of tho <br />Application for Payment to OWNER with <br />ENGINEER's recommendation, the amount <br />recommended will (subject to the provisions of <br />paragraph 11.02.D) become due, and when <br />due will be paid by OWNER to CONTRACTOR. <br />D. Reduction in Payment <br />1. OWNER may refuse to make <br />payment of the full amount recommended by <br />ENGINEER because: <br />a. claims have been made against <br />OWNER on account of CONTRACTOR's <br />performance or furnishing of the Work; <br />b Liens have been filed in connection <br />with the Work, except where <br />CONTRACTOR has delivered a specific <br />00700 - General Conditions REV 5-10-13.doc <br />00700 - 39 <br />F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1302-IR Blvd Resurfacing (SCOP) US1 to 17th St\Admim\bid oocuments\00700 - General Conditions REV 5• I0-13.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.