Laserfiche WebLink
.If <br />• I <br />However, the drafting of the Master Plan continues. Thus, the reasons <br />prompting the informal moratorium in May, 1972, remain, the only dif- <br />ference being that the current situation is now more critical than ever due <br />to the phenomenal rush to the Zoning Commission. <br />The Indian River County Commission has the express power under <br />Section 27 (D), Indian River County Ordinance 71-3, to employ stop -gap <br />methods ."....pending the completion of comprehensive zoning plans." We <br />request this Commission to act pursuant to this Section and to impose a <br />moratorium on all present and future rezoning requests which are de novo <br />in nature, (i. e., are not related .to previously approved and on-going <br />i <br />developments) and which could significantly affect the completion and <br />adoption of the Master Plan now under consideration by joint City and County <br />commissions and officials. This is the only course of action that would <br />4 <br />ensure that the Plan, when adopted, would not be rendered obsolete through <br />pre -adoption rezoning! <br />The only alternative to a rezoning moratorium is to stop the <br />expenditure of further County, State and Federal funds on a plan which <br />promises to be subject to so many special interest exceptions,. that it is <br />really no "land -use plan" at all, merely a very expensive zoning map. <br />Thus, in the alternative, if the moratorium requested above is not granted, <br />then Petitioners request that a moratorium be placed on the expenditure of <br />further funds on continued consideration of a Master Plan that will be <br />rendered moot by interim rezoning. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />QL <br />%?Ld�`�,yJ�o/�i'��=4� l.�vX•� �'�,��„�. man/ �5t�c.N' f}'Sto�-, <br />C,, " `-vl t �W S � � ✓O�C;/�M.1 U fiiTlM�t� <br />O <br />(/.Ply-e✓`�.e .-..�, Q-o�a-a e.c a x�+---.. <br />NOV 2 2 1972. <br />Boa 18 pact 7 <br />