Laserfiche WebLink
be Alterations to Nonconforming Signs. No existing nonconforming sign <br />shall be structurally altered, unless brought into conformity with the <br />requirements of this section. However, this restriction shall not <br />apply to the change of copy. <br />c.° Termination of Nonconforming Signs. Nonconforming signs shall be <br />terminated and removed in the following manner: <br />i. By Abandonment. Abandonment of a nonconforming sign shall <br />require the real property owner immediately to remove such sign <br />or bring it into conformity. <br />lie By Violation. Any violation of this ordinance other than the <br />existing nonconforming status of a sign at the time of enactment <br />of this ordinance shall require the owner immediately to remove <br />such sign. <br />By Destruction, Damage or Deterioration. The use of any noncon- <br />forming sign shall terminate whenever the sign is damaged or <br />destroyed beyond fifty (50%) percent of the replacement cost of <br />the sign from any cause whatsoever, or become substandard under <br />any applicable County ordinance, or becomes a hazard or danger, <br />and upon termination shall be removed. <br />That the Code of Ordinances of Indian River County is hereby amended by adding a <br />section to be numbered 25-0.10, which section shall read as follows: <br />a. General Policy Regulating Removal. The.Code Enforcement Officer shall <br />notify the owner. or other persons having control or authority over a <br />sign prohibited pursuant to 525-0.5 in accordance with §25-0.11.c and <br />specify a reasonable time for removal or other required action regard- <br />ing the sign. Notwithstanding, this provision, hazardous signs or any <br />sign placed upon public property or public right-of-way without proper <br />authorization from the County, may be removed immediately by the Code <br />Enforcement Officer without prior notice. The Code Enforcement <br />Officer shall allow a prohibited sign to remain only for the minimum <br />time reasonably necessary pursuant to code enforcement procedures <br />incorporated into Code of Ordinances of Indian River County. <br />The Federal Highway Beautification Act of 1965 and after Chapter 479, <br />Florida Statutes, provide that signs located on interstate or federal <br />aid primary system highways in compliance with applicable federal and <br />state laws must be compensated for forced removal. The Board of <br />County Cenmissioners shall consider the specific costs and benefits <br />associated with the removal of any sign protected by the referenced <br />federal and state laws. The County shall consider the following <br />factors and determine the most cost effective, equitable, and legally <br />sustainable course of action: <br />(i) The availability of state and/or federal funds for enforce- <br />ment of the respective state and/or federal laws (i.e., <br />compensation to sign owners); <br />(ii) Availability of local funds to implement the subject state <br />and/or federal laws; and <br />(iii)Evolving state and federal legislation and case law which <br />may assist in resolving issues of equity and public inter- <br />est; and <br />-19- <br />be <br />Continuation and or removal <br />of existing signs <br />or Grandfather Clause <br />All existing signs or <br />advertising structures <br />properly permitted and <br />conforming to the sign <br />ordinance of the Indian <br />River County in effect <br />prior to the adoption <br />of this ordinance <br />may continue in use in <br />accordance with other <br />provisions of this <br />ordinance and Section 25 J <br />Indian River County Code <br />of Laws and Ordinances <br />providing for the <br />regulation of nonconformities. <br />The Federal Highway Beautification Act of 1965 and after Chapter 479, <br />Florida Statutes, provide that signs located on interstate or federal <br />aid primary system highways in compliance with applicable federal and <br />state laws must be compensated for forced removal. The Board of <br />County Cenmissioners shall consider the specific costs and benefits <br />associated with the removal of any sign protected by the referenced <br />federal and state laws. The County shall consider the following <br />factors and determine the most cost effective, equitable, and legally <br />sustainable course of action: <br />(i) The availability of state and/or federal funds for enforce- <br />ment of the respective state and/or federal laws (i.e., <br />compensation to sign owners); <br />(ii) Availability of local funds to implement the subject state <br />and/or federal laws; and <br />(iii)Evolving state and federal legislation and case law which <br />may assist in resolving issues of equity and public inter- <br />est; and <br />-19- <br />