|
GENERALIZED ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDAJ
<br />URBANIZED AREAS*
<br />UNINTERRUPTED FLOW
<br />Group A (loss than 0.60 signalized intersections per mile) (Waralogn For a
<br />specific ansdyata a faoiliL3ea unintorrupl.od portions and
<br />the port(ona subject to capas:lty constraints should be
<br />evaluated separately.)
<br />Lant&( Level of Service
<br />Divided A B C D E
<br />2 Undiv. 4,500 129000 16,300 20,000 24,700
<br />4 Div. 110000 289000 36,700 42,800 50,200
<br />6 Div. ... 1 G,400 423400 660300 64,400 75,300
<br />8 Div. 20,700 63,100 69,200 60,600 94,100
<br />INTERRUPTED FLOW
<br />Group 13 (0.50 to 2.49 signalized intersections per mile)
<br />Lanes/ Level of Service
<br />Divided A•• 11 C D•••
<br />2 Undiv. 11,GOO 14,700 16,100
<br />4 Div. - IrV900 31,900 34,200
<br />G Div. - 40,300 48,400 51,200
<br />8 Div. - 49,900 59,800 62,800
<br />F.s..
<br />IG,200
<br />34,200 C
<br />51200 1.
<br />62,800 A
<br />S
<br />9
<br />Group C (2.50 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) )
<br />Lane&( Level of Service
<br />Divided . A•• B•• C D E
<br />2 Undiv. - - 9,500 139400 150000
<br />4 Div. 20,500 29,400 32,200
<br />6Div. - - 317300 45,000 48,800
<br />8 Div. 38,300 55,800 609400
<br />Group D (more than 4.50 signalized intersections per mile and not within
<br />primary city central business district of urbanized
<br />area over 500,000)
<br />Lanes/ Level of Service
<br />Divided A•• B•' C•• I) E
<br />2 Undiv. - - - i l ,600 14,700
<br />4 Diva - - 25,600 32,000
<br />6 Div. _ _ - 38,700 49,000
<br />8 Div. - - - 48,000 60,100
<br />Group I (within urbanized area over 500,000 and leading to or within
<br />6 miles of primary city contra) business district)
<br />Lanes Level of Service
<br />A B C D E
<br />4 25,900 40,000 57,100 68,900 74,100
<br />6 38,900 60,000 85,600 103,400 111200
<br />8 61 ,900 80,100 114,200 137,900 149,200
<br />10 64,900 100300 142,700 172,300 185,300
<br />12 75800 117,000 166,8(10 201,500 216,700
<br />14 86,100 132,900 189,500 228,900 246,100
<br />Group 9 (within urbanized area and not in Group 1)
<br />Imes Level of Service
<br />A B C D. E
<br />4 24,200 37,300 53,200 64200 69,100
<br />6 36AW 560000 79AM 96,400 1030600
<br />6 48,400 74,600 106,400 1289500 138200
<br />10 60,400 93,300 133,000 1609600 172,700
<br />12 70,600 1098000 165,400 187,700 201,800
<br />14 770900 120AM 171,500 207,100mgm 222,700
<br />NON -STATE ROADWAYS
<br />MAJOR CITY/COUNTY ROADWAYS
<br />Lanes/ Level of Service
<br />Divided A•• B•• C D
<br />E
<br />2 Undiv. 10,900 13,400 14,700
<br />4 Div. 23,800 29,500 31,900
<br />6 Div. - - 36,600 44,700 47,900
<br />OTHER SIGNALIZED ROADWAYS
<br />C (signalized intersection analysis)
<br />L
<br />A Lmeed Level of Service
<br />5 Divided A•• B•• C D E
<br />S 2 Undiv. - - 5,200 10,300 11,700
<br />Div. 11_1 4 Di - - 11,500 22.800 25.300
<br />Group E (more than 4.60 signalized intersections per mile and within
<br />primary city central business district of urbanized C;
<br />area over 5)0,000) 1
<br />A
<br />Lanes/ Level of Service S
<br />Divided A•• F306 C•` 1) F: S
<br />2 Undiv. - - - 13,000 14,700
<br />4 Div. - - - 28,800 32,000 111
<br />6 Div. - 44,!00 49,000
<br />8 Div. - - - 54,700 GQ100
<br />ADJUSTMENTS
<br />DIVIDED/UNDrvIDED
<br />(alter corresponding two-way volume indicated percent)
<br />Lanes Median Left Turn Bays _ Adjustment Factors
<br />2 Divided Yes . 5%
<br />2 Undivided No .15%
<br />Multi Undivided Yes 5%
<br />Multi Undivided No .20%
<br />ONE-WAY
<br />(alter corresponding two-way volume indicated percent)
<br />One -Way Corresponding Adjustment
<br />Lanes Two -Way Lanes Factor
<br />2 4 .40%
<br />3 6 -40%
<br />4 8 -40%
<br />5 6 - 25%
<br />' The table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used
<br />for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer model. should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques etdst.
<br />Values shown are annual average daily traffic (AAD7) ma�dmum volumes (based on K100 factors, not peak to daily ratios) for levels of service, and are based,on the 1985
<br />Highway Capacity Manual and Florida traffic, roadway and gignalizalion duta. The tbo,e'a input value assumptions and level
<br />Cannot be achieved. of service criteria appear on the back.
<br />�--' `•' Volumes are comparable because intersection capacities are reached.
<br />Source: Florida Department of Transportation, 1991. 1 F
<br />04/12/92
<br />
|