1996-07 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r ORDINANCE NO. 96- 07 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption Public Hearing on March 19, 1996, after advertising pursuant to F.S.163.3184(15)(b)(2) and (c); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that: SECTION 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption and Transmittal The amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in section 2 is hereby adopted, and five (5) copies are directed to be transmitted to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs and one (1) copy is directed to be transmitted to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. SECTION 2. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan The land use designation of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida to wit: THE WEST 20 ACRES OF TRACT 41 SECTION 41 TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 25, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; SUBJECT TO ALL RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD AND CONTAINING 18.365 NET ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Is changed from L-2, Low -Density Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acre) to M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1 (up to 8 units/acre) and the Future Land Use Map is hereby revised accordingly. SECTION 3. Repeal of Conflictinq Provisions All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 4. Severability It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that if any provision of this ordinance and therefore, the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Amendment is for any reason finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions.