Laserfiche WebLink
K <br />Appendix A* <br />Criteria <br />and <br />Relative <br />Weight <br />for Proposal <br />Ranking/Selection <br />experience <br />PLANNING <br />Indian <br />AND <br />INDIAN <br />River <br />APPLICATION <br />RIVER <br />County <br />SERVICES <br />COUNTY <br />Small <br />PROPOSALS <br />Proposer A. <br />Proposer v. <br />Evaluation <br />Factor <br />1. Successful Florida <br />Small Cities CDBG <br />experience. <br />2. Management and <br />staffing: experience, <br />c a p a c i t y a n d <br />availability. <br />3. Approach to needs, <br />tasks to be performed <br />(thorough, services <br />match needs). <br />Ratings: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor <br />4. Successful <br />similar <br />experience <br />with <br />Florida <br />Small <br />Cities <br />and <br />Counties <br />5. Familiarity <br />or ability <br />to <br />quickly <br />become <br />familiar <br />with <br />local <br />conditions. <br />(This does <br />not <br />require <br />previous <br />employment <br />contractual <br />experience <br />or <br />with <br />the <br />County.) <br />Ratings: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor <br />