My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-013
CBCC
>
Ordinances
>
2000's
>
2007
>
2007-013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2016 4:07:15 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 4:15:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2007-013
Adopted Date
03/20/2007
Agenda Item Number
9.A.3.
Ordinance Type
Pretreatment Regulations
State Filed Date
03\27\2007
Entity Name
Wastewater Discharge
Code Number
Chapter 201 Amendments
Subject
Pretreatment Regulations for Users of Wastewater Systems
Codified or Exempt
Codified
Archived Roll/Disk#
3126
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORDINANCE NO. 2007-013 <br />Section 201.90. Affirmative Defenses to Discharge Violations <br />(A) Upset - <br />(1) <br />set: <br />(1) For the purposes of section 201.90, upset means an exceptional incident in <br />which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with categorical pretreatment <br />standards because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the user. An upset does <br />not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly <br />designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive <br />maintenance, or careless or improper operation. <br />(2) An upset shall constitute an affirmative defense to an action brought for <br />noncompliance with categorical pretreatment standards if the requirements of <br />paragraph (C), below, are met. <br />(3) A user who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall <br />demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other <br />relevant evidence that: <br />(a) An upset occurred and the user can identify the cause(s) of the upset; <br />(b) The facility was at the time being operated in a prudent and workman -like <br />manner and in compliance with applicable operation and maintenance procedures; and <br />(c) The user has submitted the following information to the County Administrator <br />within twenty-four (24) hours of becoming aware of the upset (if this information is <br />provided orally, a written submission must be provided within five (5) days): <br />(1) A description of the indirect discharge and cause of noncompliance; <br />(2) The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times or, if not <br />corrected, the anticipated time the noncompliance is expected to continue; and <br />(3) Steps being taken and/or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent <br />recurrence of the noncompliance. <br />(4) In any enforcement proceeding, the user seeking to establish the occurrence <br />of an upset shall have the burden of proof. <br />(5) Users will have the opportunity for a judicial determination on any claim of <br />upset only in an enforcement action brought for noncompliance with categorical <br />pretreatment standards. <br />(6) Users shall control production of all discharges to the extent necessary to <br />maintain compliance with categorical pretreatment standards upon reduction, loss, or <br />failure of its treatment facility until the facility is restored or an alternative method of <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.