My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-031
CBCC
>
Ordinances
>
2000's
>
2002
>
2002-031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2019 12:21:48 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 3:46:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2002-031
Adopted Date
11/12/2002
Ordinance Type
Wireless Telecommunications
State Filed Date
11\26\2002
Entity Name
Wireless Facility Master Plan
Code Number
Chapter 911 and Chapter 971 Amendments
Subject
Wireless Telecommunications Facilities
Cell Phone Tower
Codified or Exempt
Codified
Archived Roll/Disk#
2744
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
845
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />ORDINANCE NO. 2002-031 <br />understory trees (minimum height of eight (8) feet at time of <br />planting) s hall b e p rovided f or e very t hirty ( 30) f eet o f t he <br />tower base/accessory structures' opaque fenced perimeter. <br />Credit shall be given for existing tree located between the <br />tower base perimeter and adjacent areas that are being <br />buffered. The required trees shall be planted in a pattern to <br />maximize s creening o f t he b ase a rea o f t he t ower from t he <br />view of adjacent road rights-of-way and adjacent <br />residentially designated or residentially used properties, <br />without conflicting with any guy wires. Trees credited or <br />planted to meet this screening requirement shall be located on <br />property under the control of the applicant to ensure that the <br />screening trees are preserved and maintained. Shrubs and <br />understory trees used to make the fencing opaque shall be <br />planted on the outside fence perimeter. Alternative <br />landscaping plans which provide for the same average <br />canopy and understory trees but propose alternative siting on <br />the parent tract of the proposed facility may be considered <br />and approved by the Planning Director, provided the <br />proposed alternative maximizes screening as provided above. <br />(2) Submittal <br />for <br />requirements <br />for replacement <br />antenna -supporting structure <br />-supporting <br />Antenna <br />-Supporting <br />Structure. <br />(c) <br />applications. <br />a. For a proposed replacement antenna -supporting structure <br />application to be considered complete, it shall contain the same <br />submittal materials required as indicated in Section 5(a)(2) a. <br />through i., k., l., n (1) through (4), and o. <br />(1) Approval criteria <br />for <br />colocations <br />on existing <br />Colocations on an Existing <br />-supporting <br />Antenna <br />-Supporting <br />Structure. <br />(c) <br />(1) Approval criteria <br />for <br />colocations <br />on existing <br />antenna <br />-supporting <br />structures: <br />a. For a colocation on an existing antenna -supporting structure to <br />be approved, it shall meet with approval criteria h. through j., <br />and 1. as indicated in Section 5 (a) (1), as well as the following: <br />b. Height. <br />A colocation on an existing antenna -supporting structure <br />shall not increase the overall height of the antenna - <br />supporting structure, antenna and/or antenna array beyond <br />that allowed under Section 5(a)(1)b. <br />Coding: Words in stfi through are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are additions. 31 <br />F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\ORDINANCE\WIRELESS ORDINANCE 2002-031 11-15-02.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.