2006-011 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORDINANCE 2006-011 days to cure such deficiencies, provided that the applicant has shown good cause for the extension and has taken reasonable steps to effect a cure. (e) Pursuant to �163.3180(16)(e), F.S., proposed proportionate fair -share mitigation for development impacts to facilities on the Strategic Intermodal System requires the concurrence of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). If an SIS facility is proposed for proportionate share mitigation, the applicant shall submit evidence of an agreement between the applicant and the FDOT for inclusion in the proportionate fair -share agreement. (f) When an application is deemed sufficient, complete, and eligible, a proposed proportionate fair -share obligation and binding agreement will be prepared by the County or the applicant with direction from the County and delivered to the appropriate parties for review, including a copy to the FDOT for any proposed proportionate fair -share mitigation on a Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) facility, no later than 60 days from the date at which the application was determined to be sufficient and no fewer than 14 days prior to the Board of County Commissioners meeting when the agreement will be considered. (g) The County shall notify the applicant regarding the date of the Board of County Commissioners meeting at which the agreement will be considered for final approval. No proportionate fair -share agreement will be effective until approved by the Board of County Commissioners. (a) Proportionate fair -share mitigation for concurrency impacts may include, separately or collectively, private funds, contributions of land, and construction and contribution of facilities as provided in 4163.3180 (16)(c), F.S. (b) A development shall not be required to pay more than its proportionate fair share. The fair market value of the proportionate fair -share mitigation for the impacted facilities shall not differ based on the form of mitigation as provided in .§163.3180 (16)(c), F.S. (c) The methodology used to calculate an applicant's proportionate fair -share obligation shall be as provided for in Section 163.3180 (12), F. S., as follows: The cumulative number of peak hour, peak direction trips from the complete buildout of the proposed development, or buildout of the stage or phase being, approved, that are assigned to the proportionate share program segment divided by the change in the peak hour directional maximum service volume (MSV) of the proportionate share Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance Strive thr- .ug : Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\kmassung\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKF\2006-_ CHAPTER 910 CMS Proportionatesharestf (6) Determining Proportionate Fair -Share Obligation (a) Proportionate fair -share mitigation for concurrency impacts may include, separately or collectively, private funds, contributions of land, and construction and contribution of facilities as provided in 4163.3180 (16)(c), F.S. (b) A development shall not be required to pay more than its proportionate fair share. The fair market value of the proportionate fair -share mitigation for the impacted facilities shall not differ based on the form of mitigation as provided in .§163.3180 (16)(c), F.S. (c) The methodology used to calculate an applicant's proportionate fair -share obligation shall be as provided for in Section 163.3180 (12), F. S., as follows: The cumulative number of peak hour, peak direction trips from the complete buildout of the proposed development, or buildout of the stage or phase being, approved, that are assigned to the proportionate share program segment divided by the change in the peak hour directional maximum service volume (MSV) of the proportionate share Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance Strive thr- .ug : Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\kmassung\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKF\2006-_ CHAPTER 910 CMS Proportionatesharestf