My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-012
CBCC
>
Ordinances
>
2000's
>
2006
>
2006-012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:17:10 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 3:36:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2006-012
Adopted Date
04/11/2006
Agenda Item Number
9.A.3.
Ordinance Type
Land Development Regulation Amendments
State Filed Date
04\19\2006
Entity Name
Subdivision Preliminary Plat Submittals
Code Number
Chapter 913
Subject
Sign Requirements for Conventional Development Projects
Codified or Exempt
Codified
Archived Roll/Disk#
3126
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
670
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
e. The applicant shall respond, in writing, to each comment following <br />receipt of the discrepancy letter and submit five (5) sets of a revised <br />preliminary plat if deemed necessary by the community development <br />staff with a written response to each item in the project's TRC <br />discrepancy letter and a written request to be placed on the planning <br />and zoning commission's agenda for approval. The applicant's <br />written response shall include a separate document that verifies <br />the duration of the required sign posting and summarizes all <br />contacts with the public. The summary shall, ata minimum, <br />describe the nature of contacts (e.g. from nearby resident, by <br />phone), the types of comments received, and changes to the <br />project proposal (if any) based on comments received. <br />g. Once all TRC comments have been adequately addressed, the <br />community development department shall schedule the application for <br />consideration at the soonest available planning and zoning <br />commission meeting. <br />An applicant may request, at any time in the review process, <br />that the application be forwarded to the planning and zoning <br />commission for consideration. Said request shall be submitted <br />to the planning division in writing and shall acknowledge that, <br />in staffs opinion, the application is not ready for consideration <br />due to a lack of adequate responses to staff and/or reviewing <br />agency comments. <br />SECTION #3: <br />Amend the site plan ordinance conceptual site plan submittal requirements of LDR Section <br />914.14(4)(b)14 to read as follows: <br />14. Additional submittal requirements may be required by staff at a formal pre - <br />application conference or a TRC meeting, whichever occurs first, based upon <br />staff concerns and issues particular to the site, surrounding area, or proposed <br />use. The posted sign notice requirements of 914.14(17) and 914.06(5)(8) <br />shall be applied. <br />SECTION #4: <br />Site plan ordinance site plan submittal requirements subsection 914.14(17) is hereby <br />established to read as follows: <br />Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 4 <br />Stfi e th fo..gh Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance <br />FACommunity Development\Users\CurDev\ORDINANCE\2006\2006- Chapters 913 and 914.RTF <br />by TRC <br />to <br />be <br />f. The TRC <br />may require <br />re -review <br />of the <br />project members <br />discussed <br />at another TRC meeting. <br />g. Once all TRC comments have been adequately addressed, the <br />community development department shall schedule the application for <br />consideration at the soonest available planning and zoning <br />commission meeting. <br />An applicant may request, at any time in the review process, <br />that the application be forwarded to the planning and zoning <br />commission for consideration. Said request shall be submitted <br />to the planning division in writing and shall acknowledge that, <br />in staffs opinion, the application is not ready for consideration <br />due to a lack of adequate responses to staff and/or reviewing <br />agency comments. <br />SECTION #3: <br />Amend the site plan ordinance conceptual site plan submittal requirements of LDR Section <br />914.14(4)(b)14 to read as follows: <br />14. Additional submittal requirements may be required by staff at a formal pre - <br />application conference or a TRC meeting, whichever occurs first, based upon <br />staff concerns and issues particular to the site, surrounding area, or proposed <br />use. The posted sign notice requirements of 914.14(17) and 914.06(5)(8) <br />shall be applied. <br />SECTION #4: <br />Site plan ordinance site plan submittal requirements subsection 914.14(17) is hereby <br />established to read as follows: <br />Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 4 <br />Stfi e th fo..gh Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance <br />FACommunity Development\Users\CurDev\ORDINANCE\2006\2006- Chapters 913 and 914.RTF <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.