2007-001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORDINANCE 2007- 0 01 (c) Prior to issuance of a development order, the community development director or his designee shall make a determination that concurrency requirements are satisfied for the type of development order under review. (d) Whenever a proportionate fair share agreement consistent with Section 910.12 is executed and other concurrency requirements specified in the agreement or in Section 91012 are satisfied, the development project which is the subiect of the proportionate fair share agreement shall be vested with a seven (7) year initial concurrency certificate regardless of the development order stage of the proiect. (e) Whenever a non-proportionate fair share developer's agreement is executed by an applicant and that developer's agreement commits the applicant to construct major capacity producing transportation improvements, the applicant's project may be vested for concurrency with a seven (7) year initial concurrency certificate if the Board of County Commissioners finds that: 1. the applicant's proposed improvements will provide significant benefits to the transportation system, and 2. all other concurrency requirements, including payment of all applicable impact fees and capacity charges as well as demonstration of available capacity on all impacted links and in all applicable concurrency facilities, are met For purposes of this provision, a "major capacity producing transportation improvement"is a proiect which adds travel lanes to an existing roadway or a corridor and expands the capacity of the roadway or corridor by at least 25% (twenty-five percent) (f) Determinations of exemption from concurrency review shall be made by the community development director or his designee. Exemptions may be based on vested rights determinations, application of de minimis criteria, or determinations that there will be no increase in density or intensity. Appeals of determinations shall follow the procedures of section 910.05. (1) A valid eenetiffeney eei4ifieate must be obtained prior-te the approval of the fellewin'—,. petential density and intensity ef uses of land. Gefietiffeney review at this stage is a gener-al proposed prejeet. Wher-e the proposed pr-ejeet is a neft PD (planned development) rez i eempr-eheasive pla-n amendment, the eenettfr-eney impaet assessment will be based eft thp, &411nw-i e For Vr-a*p gado. ti-;11 tua (Maximum ,,.bef of S NI cvrrcv"prcrca �l.i.an.ai.uaaaor- r. �. t o, residential tnts allowed Yvi aviv based uponthe YivYv.av iiaab��v��i'�--land ruc-i dAA^sYig en) x Total Prep + ty Y'7ceFes Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 3 Stfike thfeu& Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance FACommunity Development\Users\CurDev\ORDINANCE\2007\2007- 910,912,Title X after 1-23-07.RTF