My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/19/1973
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1973
>
9/19/1973
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:26:53 AM
Creation date
6/10/2015 2:42:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/19/1973
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1.3 <br />DR. HERBERT KALE, PRESIDENT OF THE PELICAN ISLAND <br />AUDUBON SOCIETY APPEARED AND REQUESTED THAT THE STATEMENT FROM <br />THE PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY BE MADE A PART-�OF THESE <br />MINUTES. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED MAKING <br />THE STATEMENT FROM THE PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY A <br />PART OF THESE MINUTES. <br />PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY <br />P. O. Box 1833 <br />VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 <br />W. W. Siebert <br />Indian River County Commissioner <br />Jjn <br />STATEMENT of Pelican Island Audubon.Society concerning requests <br />for rezoning of the south beach area presented at public hearings <br />before the Indian River County Zoning Commission, September 6, 1973 <br />and the Indian River County Commissioners, September 19, 1973. <br />The following statement outlines the position of the Society <br />on the proposed rezoning requests on the barrier island south of <br />Vero Beach, in accordance with policy approved by the Board of <br />Directors. <br />We have stated in the past that we wish to see the present <br />character of the barrier island in Vero Beach and Indian River <br />County be maintained--i.e., primarily residential and low density. <br />Rezoning of the land to a classificiation that will greatly contri- <br />bute to an actual alteration of this present character is not <br />consistent with the aims of many organizations and people in this <br />county --business, governmental, public, private, advisory, and <br />civic --all of whom insist that they, too, want to preserve and <br />protect the present character of our area. <br />Although we agree that the proposed Veromar project may be <br />well designed and considerate of the surrounding community, the <br />fact remains that this project is only the first of many waiting <br />In the wings for this part of the south beach. Rezoning of this <br />parcel today vall set the pattern for the entire area. And without <br />drawing any conclusions, about whether or -not this classification <br />of zoning is right or wrong for the future of the south beach <br />(frankly, we do not now know the answer to that question), we must <br />ask the question "Are we ready for this today?" <br />Several months ago a member of the zoning commission stated <br />that he could not vote for the rezoning of the south beach area <br />until provisions for supportive facilities of water, sewage, and <br />transportation, particularly a second bridge, were available and <br />-in existence. And until that time we can not logically allow the <br />tremendous growth that will surely follow this rezoning. <br />The life support systems of the entire south beach area <br />including construction materials and services, water, food, <br />,-police protection, hospital and medical services, garbage and <br />_.trash collection, domestic services, and, in the future, sewage <br />_treatment are all based on the mainland. All of these, except <br />'water,.must cross the one and only bridge now in existence. <br />13 - <br />"This 3s 100 % recycled paper" <br />BOOK PAGE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.