Laserfiche WebLink
MR. WILCOX STATED THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO WANT TO <br />LIVE IN CONDOMINIUMS AND NOT SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND THEY <br />SHOULD NOT BE DENIED THIS RIGHT. <br />JACK STURGIS STATED THAT MULTIFAMILY ZONING IS <br />UP -GRADING PROPERTY. <br />CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR <br />HIS RECOMMENDATION. <br />MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT <br />THE BOARD DENIED THE REZONING FOR VERO MAR SHORES DEVELOPMENT, <br />HE RECOMMENDS KEEPING THIS PROPERTY IN R -IA, SINGLE FAMILY ZONING. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOGOSIAN, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DENIED THE APPLICATION <br />FOR REZONING AS REQUESTED BY DON WILCOX - (.JONNIE DAHLSTROM). <br />THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT WAS MADE BY CHAIRMAN LOY. <br />"IN CHECKING THE MINUTES, I REALIZED THAT I APPARENTLY <br />DID NOT MAKE A STATEMENT RELATIVE TO MY REASONS FOR DENIAL OF THE <br />PROPOSED REZONING APPLICATIONS THAT WERE BEFORE US'ON SEPTEMBER <br />19, 1973; THE VERO MAR PROJECT AND THE APPLICATION OF .JONNIE <br />DAHLSTROM, ETA.L PROJECT, <br />FOR THE RECORD, I WOULD LIKE TO SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING <br />STATEMENT: <br />_ THE PROPOSED CHANGES WERE CONTRARY TO THE ESTABLISHED <br />LAND'USE PATTERN FOR THE AREA AS EVIDENCED BY THE MATERIALS SUB- <br />MITTED REGARDING THE GRADUAL, ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA <br />ACCORDING TO EXISTING ZONING REGULATION. <br />THE PROPOSALS WOULD ALTER THE DENSITY PATTERN WHICH HAS <br />BEEN; ESTABLISHED AND ABIDED BY OVER THE PAST MANY YEARS. <br />I THESE PROPOSALS WOULD CREATE EXCESSIVE TRAFFIC CONGESTION <br />AT / TIME WHEN THIS BOARD IS RECEIVING SYSTEMATIC COMPLAINTS RE- <br />GARIING THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL WORK ON A -IA SOUTH, AND WORKING <br />DILIGENTLY TO SECURE A MUCH NEEDED SECOND BRIDGE TO SERVE THE. <br />AREA. THE GENERAL SAFETY OF THE CITIZENS WOULD BE AFFECTED 'UNTIL <br />THESE PROJECTS ARE ACCOMPLISHED. <br />t THE PROPOSALS WOULD BE A STIMULUS TO DEVELOPMENT OF ADJACENT <br />P"ROPERTIES, AT A TIME WHEN UTILITIES AND GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES ARE <br />NO_TfAVAILABLE TO HANDLE THE A14TICI"PATED IMMEDIATE NEEDS, <br />THE PROPOSALS WOULD.ADVERSELY AFFECT PRESENT PROPERTY VALUES <br />FOR<THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMEOWNER. <br />THESE ARE MY PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS BASED ON THE MATERIALS <br />AND_ INFORMATIO14 AS PRESENTED AND AVAILABLE TO ME,fl <br />BOOK - 18 PAGE 42 <br />