11/7/1973 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

pat;Q 2 ' "(� joaseSsiatls. • OL' i:ii•: 1'�dr_rrtl Gnvezn.cnt itself in tier ri-nenco ni c%press, con-ro.:.ional cri:ncilt :%ve,, tu•r. ntlh ject to any fora of state to-C.1C toll. "A 1-o E•rniver of this immunity, which extends to the entire interest of.. the ,Sovarn.-cnt; has boon shorn in the case. at hand. Titus, the Tax Collector has failed to carry his burden of showing that the United States was not entitled to an exemption as to this property. Jc€ frrsr.:� Crttznt y, Yla._y._ I.T.R. , stmra, at 136; U.S. v. CMIt1ty 01 Son ,. 249 F.Supp. 321 (S.D. Cal. 1966). It follo.rs that the thrcc-fou,ths interest of the United States teas not subject to the . tMh asst:.smcrts ti question, and that tzze tat: certificates are void. I^1 IS� : _,PORRE 0:02= la"M ADJ UD G10 TILT: 1. The realty in question, described in Paragraph V of the cc p3aint, is jointly mmad in fca simple by -the united States of America. with an undivided th ee-fourths intcrwst therein, and '" r ' Tykvart, vith an undiv-idcd fine -fou tiI interc�t the oin. rlru • *'�tii 2. The interest os na Uaitadl States in the property was not st:b j ec t to the roal property t= assessments for the yea::s 1967 mad fallo:.ina, levied by the Tat Collector of Indian : vas Caunty, FIorid, a. 3. T -xe Tax. cart iiicates held by defendants, .roe L. Burton, - ae'� r...^ S tr�.4pht 1'*.• ea e Hi e' and lar.`'+ Evelyn iad_sti 4i4 1113{ iii V:Z 1 -Trig Agia {., 1i2.�{'� V• 7 { w..� .r� VO. d, r ♦ 1� i •q.• r -8 �!• ��. .�.� .4 T �.� f7 ��t ti. 4 L., {.� the t'a cv J.G4a.. hs ir•1/C'.=as- Or L1 �O Y�.i. .�2�.' , 1i...� n0aa TT \7. 250 «r n 7 93', 936% (:54t'a Cd w. l�':'• r•,7 . 7.2 7...'�...0.. 0!: -_� - , • . .. _ •. r. � � , ��-� iti:iii ff .� .-�-h to r • .. ......1i• �.� J.w)4.• G.•^: �.. 1�VaYry4?..•/iiJ l'i:l.. �.:J, '1L• ! 46i V41i. 11.'r �1/vJ f N 0 V HOW- JLQ ?AgfL 93 71973