Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />. <br />THE FOLLOWING "ANSWER TO PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION <br />AND REHEARING", RECEIVED FROM ATTORNEY BURCH IS HEREBY BEING <br />MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES. <br />BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA <br />IN R.L: THE MATTER OF: <br />VEROMAR DEVELOP'NIENT LTD., a <br />limited partnership; Application for <br />Zoning Change Permit <br />from R1 Single Family District <br />to R2 Multiple Family District, <br />ANSWER TO PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION AND REHEARING <br />COMES NOW the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER <br />COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its undersigned attorney and answers the Petition of <br />Veromar Development Ltd. as follows: <br />1. The Petition for Rehearing is denied. <br />2. Attached hereto and made a part of this Answer are the <br />reasons stated by the Board for denying the application as <br />shown in the official minutes of the Board's meetings. <br />(2.o-vc� <br />Paul Burch <br />Indian River County Attorney <br />I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing <br />Answer to Petition for Clarification and Rehearing was furnished to JOSEPH C. <br />JACOBS, Attorney for Veromar Development Lttd. , Ervin, Varn, Jacobs & Odom, <br />305 South Gadsden Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32302, by mail this day of <br />Wpdy- , 1973. . <br />Paul D. Burch <br />Indian River County Attorney <br />THE FOLLOWING FIFTEEN PAGES ARE 9XCERPTS TAKEN FROM THE COUNTY <br />COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 19TH AND OCTOBER 30TH, 1973. <br />f <br />- 46 - <br />NOV 71973 s <br />