My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/7/1973
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1973
>
11/7/1973
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:26:53 AM
Creation date
6/10/2015 2:48:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/07/1973
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DR, HERBERT KALE, PRESIDENT OF.THE PELICAN. ISLAND <br />° AUDUBON SOCIETY APPEARED AND REQUESTED THAT THE STATEMENT FROM <br />THE PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY BE MADE A PART OF THESE <br />MINUTES, <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT.'SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED MAKING <br />THE STATEMENT FROM THE PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY A <br />PART OF THESE MINUTES, <br />PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY <br />P. O. Box 1833 <br />VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 _ <br />t't W. W. Siebert <br />Ind3,an River County Cc=-, sioner <br />STATETC-NT of Pelican Island Audubon Society concerning requests <br />for rezoning of the south beach area presented at public hearings <br />before the Indian i3lver County Zoning Commission, September 6, 1973 <br />.. and the Indian River County Commissioners, September 19, 1973. <br />k The following statement outlines the position'of the Society <br />a on the proposed rezoning requests on the barrier island south of <br />Vero Beach, in accordance with policy approved by the Board of <br />Directors. <br />We have stated in the past that'we wish to see the present <br />character of the barrier island in Vero Beach and Indian ;liver <br />County be maintained--i.e., primarily residential and low density. <br />Rezoning of the land to a classificiation that will greatly contri— <br />bute to an actual alteration of this present character is not <br />consistent with the airs of many organizations and people in this <br />county --business, governmental, public, private, advisory, and <br />civic --911 of whom insist that they, too, want to preserve and <br />protect the present character o -f our area. <br />Although we agree that the proposed Veromar project may be <br />well designed and considerate of the surrou-r:ding community, the <br />fact remains that this project is only the first of many waiting <br />in the wings for this part of the south beach. Rezoning of this <br />parcel today will set the pattern for the entire area. And without <br />drawing any conclusions about whether or not this classification <br />of .zoning is right or wrong for the future of the south beach <br />we , must <br />(frankly, we do not now know the answer to that question), <br />ask the question "Are we ready for this today?" <br />Several months ago a member of the zoning commission stated <br />that he could not voce for the rezoning of the south beach area <br />until provis:.ons for supportive facilities of water, sewage, and <br />transportation particularly a second bridge, were available and <br />in existence. And until that time we can not logically allow the <br />tremendous growth that will surely follow this rezoning. <br />The life support systems of the entire south beach area <br />including construction materials and services, water, food, <br />police protection, hospital and medical services, garbage and <br />trash collection, domestic services, and, In the future, sewage <br />treatment are all based on the mainland. All of these, except <br />grater, m_jst cross the one and only bridge now in existence. <br />NOV 71973 eooK 18 {Aai?127 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.