11/21/1973 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

a '67 ATTORNEY BURCH REQUESTED THAT ON PAGE 24, THIRD PARAGRAPH, SECOND SENTENCE BE CHANGED TO READ: "ATTORNEY BURCH DID NOT HIRE THE APPRAISOR BECAUSE THE COST WAS, IN HIS OPINION, HIGHER THAN HE THOUGHT THE COMMISSIONERS HAD ANTICIPATED AND HE WAS BRINGING IT BEFORE THE BOARD FORITHEIR RECOMMENDATIONS " COMMISSIONER DRITENBAS REQUESTED THAT ON PAGE 46 THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE BE ADDED TO THE BOTTOM OF.THE PAGE. "THE FOLLOWING FIFTEEN PAGES ARE EXCERPTS TAKEN FROM THE COUNTY COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 19TH AND OCTOBER 10TH, 1973." COMMISSIONER SIEBERT REQUESTED ON PAGE 7, AFTER THE SIXTH PARAGRAPH, THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH BE INSERTED. "COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT HE UNDERSTOOD THAT THERE WAS NO FORMAL WRITTEN AGREEMENT ON THE AVAILABILITY OF WATER METERS AND IT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE OFFER OF THE SALE " THESE CORRECTIONS HAVING BEEN MADE ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 7, 1973, AS WRITTEN. CHAIRMAN LOY BRIEFLY INFORMED THE BOARD OF A SERIES OF EVENTS REGARDING A TRIP TO TALLAHASSEE WITH COMMISSIONERS" BOGOSIAN AND SIEBERT AND ATTORNEY BURCH TO DISCUSS WITH VARIOUS CABINET OFFICIALS AND AIDES THE NEGATIVE FEELINGS OF THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY REGARDING THE PRISON FACILITY PROPOSED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. CHAIRMAN Loy STATED THAT THE OUTCOME OF THEIR MEETINGS WAS THAT THE PRISON PROJECT WAS DEFERRED FOR FURTHER STUDY. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMPLIMENTED THE CHAIRMAN ON DOING AN EXCELLENT JOB OF CONVEYING THE COUNTY'S WISHES. ATTORNEY BURCH STATED THAT WHILE IN TALLAHASSEE HE STOPPED IN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE TO QUESTION WHEN HE COULD EXPECT A RESPONSE TO HIS LETTER REQUESTING OPINIONS ON SEVERAL QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO COUNTY PLANNING PROCEDURES. THE FOLLOWING LETTER WAS RECEIVED FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE - 2 -