My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-033
CBCC
>
Ordinances
>
2000's
>
2004
>
2004-033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2017 2:41:45 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 3:41:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2004-033
Adopted Date
10/19/2004
Ordinance Type
Zoning
State Filed Date
10\25\2004
Entity Name
Jeanette M Lier Trust SE CR510 and Indian River Lagoon
Subject
Rezone from A-1 to RS-2
Rezone from A-1 to RS-3
Codified or Exempt
Codified
Archived Roll/Disk#
2744
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
759
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
William G. Collins II, County Attorney <br />Marian E. Fell, Assistant County Attorney <br />William K. DeBraal, Assistant County Attorney <br />Office of <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY <br />ATTORNEY <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Gilliam G. Collins II - County Attorney <br />DATE: January 6, 2006 <br />SUBJECT: Diminimus Error in Legal Description of Conservation Areas Within <br />Ordinance 2004-033 and Ordinance 2005-003 (the Lier Property) <br />1. Ordinance 2004-033 rezoned property lying south of County Road 510 and east of the <br />Indian River from A-1 to RS -3 in part and rezoned 3.4 acres from A-1 to CON -2. <br />Included among the CON -2 zoned property was a "Parcel A" consisting of .04 acres. <br />This rezoning was approved by the Board on October 19, 2004. <br />2. Subsequently by Ordinance 2005-003 the Board of County Commissioners rezoned the <br />upland portion from RS -3 to RS -6, but the Conservation Parcel A was continued to be <br />described as .04 acres. This ordinance was approved on January 24, 2005 in settlement <br />of a lawsuit. The property was deed restricted to no more than 3 units per acre despite <br />the RS -6 zoning as part of the settlement The intent was to allow smaller lots but <br />maintain the RS -3 density. <br />3. On April 29, 2005 I received correspondence from attorney Bruce Barkett indicating <br />that the Conservation Parcel A legal description was in error. The Environmental <br />Consultant's field notes were misinterpreted by the surveyor to include approximately <br />.038 acres within the CON -2 zone which actually lies east of the bulkhead along the <br />river. Attached please find Mr. Barkett's correspondence which includes copies of <br />both of the above ordinances along with the Surveyor's Affidavit with sketch and <br />correct legal description. The Environmental Consultant's Affidavit and original field <br />notes. I have tabbed the sketch that shows as a yellow -hatched area the portion of the <br />property erroneously included in Parcel A of the Conservation zoned land lying east of <br />the bulkhead. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.