Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />' o The population density of the entire study area is 9.6 persons per <br />acre. <br />o The study area is approximately 95ercent developed, <br />Pand the <br />installation of a wastewater collection system would not encourage <br />' additional development beyond that growth which is presently <br />planned. <br />o Approximately 95 percent of the flow capacity for the collection <br />' system would be attributable to developments in existence in 1972. <br />' <br />o All service areas meet the "two-thirds rule", indicating <br />has been determined that the study area meets the criteria of PRM <br />established neighborhoods. <br />' <br />o Local water quality management plans, such as the 201 for Indian <br />' <br />River County and Indian River County Area -Wide Wastewater Master <br />Plan, September <br />the <br />1985, recommend a central wastewater collection <br />to <br />system for the community. <br />' <br />persons per acre, indicating that a central collection system is <br />o A low-pressure p sure grinder pump sewer system was found to be the most <br />' <br />cost-effective technology. <br />' <br />o The County has the financial capability to construct, operate and <br />' <br />maintain the wastewater system presented in this report. <br />' <br />1.3 RECOMMENDATIONS <br />' <br />It <br />has been determined that the study area meets the criteria of PRM <br />78-9. <br />All <br />of the blocks exhibited substantial human habitation, and 80 percent of <br />' <br />the <br />study area had a high population density of greater than or equal <br />to <br />8.6 <br />persons per acre, indicating that a central collection system is <br />needed. Low pressure grinder pump collection sewers were determined <br />to be <br />' <br />the <br />most reasonable wastewater collection system for the study area, <br />based <br />upon economic and practical considerations. <br />' IRC.VB4 <br />6/4/87 <br />1-3 <br />