My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/8/1975
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1975
>
1/8/1975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2024 10:03:35 AM
Creation date
6/2/2015 3:50:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/08/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IS <br />PAGE 6 ' "PRELIMINARY PLATS" <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE QUESTIONED IF A DEVELOPMENT WAS SPLIT <br />WITH HALF OF THE DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTY AND THE OTHER HALF IN <br />A MUNICIPALITY, WHO WOULD GIVE APPROVAL AND WOULD THE MORE RESTRICTIVE <br />REGULATIONS TAKE PRECEDENT. <br />MR. BERG STATED THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT WOULD NEED APPROVAL OF <br />BOTH GOVERNING BODIES, <br />CHAIRMAN LOY STATED THAT WE WOULD HAVE NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT <br />THE MUNICIPALITIES HALF, THEY WOULD FOLLOW THEIR REGULATIONS IN <br />THE CITY PORTION AND THE PORTION LYING IN THE COUNTY WOULD HAVE TO <br />FOLLOW THE COUNTY'S REGULATIONS. <br />PAGE 13 - "SECTION E" <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE QUESTIONED IF THERE IS A RAILROAD CROSSING, <br />DOES THE DEVELOPER HAVE TO PAY THE COST TO SIGNALIZE THE CROSSING. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, STATED THAT THERE IS NOTHING NOW THAT <br />STATES IF THERE IS AN EXISITING RAILROAD CROSSING THE DEVELOPER PAYS <br />FOR THE SIGNALIZING. IT WAS STATED THAT NEW RAILROAD CROSSINGS ARE <br />COVERED. <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT"WHERE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE <br />ANY EXISTING RAILROAD CROSSINGS, IT WILL BE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE <br />DEVELOPER", SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE ORDINANCE. <br />PAGE 14 - "BLOCKS" <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE QUESTIONED IF BICYCLE PATHS SHOULD BE <br />INCLUDED IN THIS SECTION. <br />MR, BERG STATED THAT BICYCLE PATHS ARE NOT INCLUDED, AND <br />POSSIBLY THEY SHOULD BE INCLUDED UNDER THE SECTION HEADED "RIGHT <br />OF -WAY". <br />COMMISSIONER MASSEY, STATED THAT THE ONLY QUESTION HE HAD <br />WAS REGARDING "WATER AND WATER RUN-OFF". <br />MR, BERG STATED THAT THIS WAS DISCUSSED AT SEVERAL MEETINGS, <br />AND IT WAS PROPOSED,A PROVISION FOR PROVIDING WATER RUN-OFF IN THE <br />SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE POLLUTION BOARD, <br />BUT IT WAS DECIDED AT THAT TIME NOT TO PUT IT IN. HOWEVER, HE STATED, <br />OUR FLOOD MAP WILL REQUIRE THAT, AT THE TIME OF THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW <br />AND FOR THE RECORD, WE SHOULD WATCH THAT CLOSELY IN SUBDIVI'SIONS <br />IN THE FUTURE, <br />-40- <br />JAN 81975 <br />RDDN 21 rAGE 462* <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.