Laserfiche WebLink
ERBE S. WOLD, OWNER OF SOUTHGATE VILLAGE, APPEARED AND DISCUSSED <br />WITH THE BOARD THE FOLLOWING LETTER. <br />• SOUTHGATE VILLAGE <br />A MOUE HOME COMMUNITY <br />*88 <br />VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 <br />.100114:0 -114064* -1* --.4 <br />Mr. Jack Jewairgs <br />County Administrator <br />1. R. County Court House <br />Vero Beach, Fla. .32960 • <br />Dear Mr. Jennings: <br />June 16, 1975 • <br />We would appreciate your passing this information onto the <br />proper authorities, probably the Count, Commissioners. <br />It appears that the volume users of water were inadvertently <br />overlooked when the Mid—Florida Utilities were granted an <br />increase in water rates. , <br />Although we feel an increase in the water rate was justified, <br />we also feel quite certain the Commissioners did not intend <br />a 333% (300 per 1,000 gal. to $ 1.00 per 1,000 Gal.) increase <br />in the rate for volume users. <br />To our knowledge, this is the only Utility that does not <br />have a sliding scale for the volume, users. <br />We have enclosed a rate schedule of the City of Vero Beach <br />end computed our waLwz bill based on-thadd =tee for the <br />month of March 1975, and find our bill would have been $372.17 <br />rather than the $887.00 billed us by Mid—Plorida <br />Thr a difference of $514.83. <br />We have contacted. Mr. MacAllister manager of the Vero Beach <br />water plant, and he informed us his superiors are unwilling <br />to discuss the matter. <br />We would respectfully request the Commission reconsider the <br />rate for the volume users, and further request any favorable <br />reconsideration would be retroactive since we feel sure, had the <br />volume users not inadvertently been overlooked, these present <br />rates would not have been in effect. <br />C: C. - <br />-17- <br />witr You. <br />Sout ate Village <br />1:1e !.171cah <br />JUL 9 1975 10K 23 f E 134 <br />