My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/10/1975
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1975
>
9/10/1975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2024 10:31:06 AM
Creation date
6/10/2015 3:52:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/10/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. A SURVEY INSPECTOR SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AND A FEE ESTAB- <br />LISHED; 2. To BRING THE PROPERTY BACK TO A "RESIDENTIAL USE" IS NOT THE <br />BEST TERMINOLOGY; 3. THERE SHOULD BE ASSURANCES THAT THE LAND WILL BE <br />RESTORED, BUT THE CALCULATIONS FOR BONDING SHOULD BE REVIEWED, <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE PROPOSED <br />ORDINANCE STATES THAT OPERATING PERMITS MAY BE REVOKED BY THE COUNTY <br />ADMINISTRATOR, AND HE RECOMMENDED THAT THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMEND <br />THEY BE REVOKED BY THE ISSUING BODY, WHICH IS THE ZONING COMMISSION. <br />THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE MINING <br />OPERATORS HAVE UNTIL OCTOBER 1ST TO GET NEW PERMITS, IN ORDER FOR THEM <br />TO OBTAIN THEIR PERMITS, THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE SHOULD BE ADOPTED BEFORE <br />OCTOBER 1ST SO THAT OPERATORS WILL KNOW WHAT WILL BE EXPECTED OF THEM, <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD RATHER EXTEND THE <br />DEADLINE FOR OBTAINING PERMITS IN ORDER TO GET THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE <br />WORKED OUT, <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE SEES PROBLEMS WITH THE WORD- <br />ING OF THE BONDING PROCEDURE, AND IT SHOULD NOT BE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRA- <br />TOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO REVOKE A MINING PERMIT, <br />CHAIRMAN LOY STATED THAT BECAUSE OF THE ITEMS DISCUSSED TODAY <br />THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE WILL BE REFERRED BACK TO THE ZONING COMMISSION <br />AND TO THE MINING REVIEW COMMITTEE, AND THEY WILL BE REQUESTED TO INVITE <br />A COUPLE OF THE MINING OPERATORS TO JOIN THEM TO DISCUSS SPECIFICALLY <br />THE QUESTIONS RAISED REGARDING THE BONDING PROCEDURE.. IF THIS CAN BE <br />HANDLED BEFORE THE OCTOBER 1ST DEADLINE, THE OPERATORS WILL OBTAIN THEIR <br />PERMITS AS USUAL; OTHERWISE WE WILL EXTEND THE OCTOBER 1ST DEADLINE, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE FEELS IF IT IS NECESSARY, THE <br />"BOARD COULD EXTEND THE MINING PERMIT DEADLINE 30 DAYS AND THEN READVERTISE <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED iINING ORDINANCE. <br />ON MOTION BY COPM1ISSIONER SIEBERT,SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING ON A <br />PROPOSED COUNTY MINING ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCES 71-3 AND 74-16. <br />- 20 - <br />SEP 10 4975 800K 23 MC[ 300 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.