Laserfiche WebLink
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED WHY CAN'T THE PLANT BE LOCATED <br />WHERE THE SUBDIVISION IS? <br />PETER ROBINSON STATED THAT F.H.A. AND V.A. REGULATIONS <br />REQUIRE THAT RESIDENTS MUST BE 399' FROM EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES, <br />WHICH WOULD EXPLAIN THE LOCATION OF THE PLANT, AND ALSO THEY FELT THIS <br />IS A MORE SUITABLE LOCATION FOR IT. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT QUESTIONED THE AFFECT OF SUCH A PLANT <br />ON THE AVAILABILITY OF WATER, AND MR, BOGOSIAN REPLIED THAT IT WOULD BE <br />A SMALL PLANT AND WOULD HAVE NO AFFECT NOW. THIS WOULD BE A PROBLEM <br />FOR THE FUTURE, <br />MR. BEINDORF STATED THAT WHILE THE BOARD CAN GRANT A FRANCHISE, <br />THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT GOVERNS PERMITS FOR THE WATER SUPPLY AND WILL <br />REQUIRE SPECIFIC ENGINEERING DATA BEFORE ISSUING A PERMIT FOR A WELL OF <br />100,000 GALLONS A DAY AND OVER. HE EXPLAINED THAT A WELL OF THIS SIZE <br />MEANS ABOUT 100 GALLONS A MINUTE, WHICH IS NOT ACTUALLY A LARGE QUANTITY, <br />AND IN HIS EXPERIENCE WILL NOT AFFECT PEOPLE IN THE AREA, <br />COMMISSIONER UODTKE ASKED ATTORNEY COLLINS WHETHER THERE IS <br />ANY RESTRICTION ABOUT ALLOWING A COMMERCIAL OPERATION SUCH AS THIS IN <br />RESIDENTIAL ZONING. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS ANSWERED THAT ESSENTIAL SERVICES ARE PERMITTED <br />IN ANY DISTRICT AS REGULATED BY LAW, THE BUILDINGS, HOWEVER, ARE SUBJECT <br />TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL, <br />CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO SPEAK IN FAVOR <br />OF OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT. <br />.JONNI DEAR, A RESIDENT OF 27TH AVE., TOOK THE FLOOR AND <br />PRESENTED A PETITION OPPOSING THE SEWER PLANT BEING ERECTED AT 27TH <br />AVENUE AND REBEL ROAD, WHICH PETITION IS HEREBY MADE PART OF THESE <br />MINUTES: <br />-33- <br />SEP 2 4 19 15 <br />8O J 23 '11q.35 <br />