My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/22/1975
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1975
>
10/22/1975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2024 10:05:37 AM
Creation date
6/10/2015 4:14:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/22/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO GET F.H.A.'S REACTION TO THE TWO CONTRACTS, WHEN THEY ARRIVED IN <br />GAINESVILLE, THEY LEARNED THAT F.H.A. ONLY SENT ONE OF THE AGREEMENTS <br />ON TO WASHINGTON AND THEIR COMMENTS WERE APPLICABLE TO THE AGREEMENT <br />ATTORNEY*HERRING HAD PREPARED, THEY APOLOGIZED FOR NOT REVIEWING THE <br />OTHER AGREEMENT AND SUGGESTED THAT WE TAKE THIS AGREEMENT BACK AND PREPARE <br />ANOTHER ONE WHICH WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE TO THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. <br />ATTORNEY HERRING APPEARED AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT AT THE <br />SEPTEMBER 10TH BOARD MEETING, THE BOARD ASKED THEIR ATTORNEY AND HIMSELF <br />TO GATHER CHER THEIR RESPECTIVE THOUGHTS AND PREPARE AN AGREEMENT. <br />IN KEEPING WITH THAT, AN AGREEMENT WAS PREPARED AND DELIVERED TO ATTORNEY <br />COLLINS, AND IT WAS HIS UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS AGREEMENT WAS MAILED TO <br />F.H.A. IN GAINESVILLE, WHO THEN MAILED IT ON TO F.H.A. IN WASHINGTON, D.C. <br />THE ATTORNEYS IN WASHINGTON REVIEWED AND SUGGESTED CHANGES AND RETURNED <br />THE AGREEMENT TO THE GAINESVILLE OFFICE, 11E REQUESTED TO BE PLACED ON <br />THE AGENDA TODAY TO DISCUSS THE CHANGES THAT F.H.A. IS REQUIRING. IT <br />NOW APPEARS THAT THESE AGENCIES HAVE WORKED ON AN AGREEMENT THAT IS NOT <br />EVEN AN AGREEMENT. HE CONTINUED THAT WE ARE STILL AT A PLACE WE WERE <br />30 DAYS AGO. WE HAVE AN AGREEMENT, WHICH WAS DRAWN UPAS REQUESTED, BASED <br />ON AN AGREEMENT FROM THIS BOARD'S ATTORNEY WITH THE SUGGESTED CHANGES, <br />ONE THAT F.H.A. CANNOT LIVE WITH AND WE WILL HAVE TO BEGIN AGAIN. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT DURING THE INTERIM PERIOD <br />UNTIL WE CAN SOLVE THESE PROBLEMS, THAT WE RESTRICT U.D.D. TO ITS IMME- <br />DIATE USERS. <br />ATTORNEY HERRING STATED THAT THE AGREEMENT PROPOSAL THAT WENT <br />UP TO GAINESVILLE WAS PREPARED BY ATTORNEY COLLINS WITH THE F.H.A. CHANGES. <br />AT THE LAST MEETING OF SEPTEMBER LOTH, THE BOARD WAS WILLING TO GRANT <br />371,000 GALLONS PER DAY, AND NOW ACCORDING TO COMMISSIONER SIEBERT'S SUGGES- <br />TION, WE ARE RECEDING FROM THAT. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ALSO SUGGESTED THAT ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO <br />F.H.A. WRITTEN OR VERBAL SHOULD GO THROUGH THIS BOARD. <br />ATTORNEY HERRING DID NOT AGREE WITH THAT SUGGESTION. <br />OCT 221975 <br />26 <br />ROUX 2 r�',E 60 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.