My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/21/1976
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1976
>
1/21/1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:18 AM
Creation date
6/3/2015 9:26:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/21/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
s <br />a <br />I <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON THE VARIOUS PROBLEMS THIS WOULD PRESENT, <br />AND IT WAS AGREED TO'ASK MR. FLETCHER, THE PROPERTY APPRAISER, TO RECOMMEND <br />A SPECIFIC PRICE FOR THOSE NEEDING PRINTS OF A SECTION OF LAND. <br />AS ATTORNEY BOGOSIAN COULD NOT BE PRESENT, PETER ROBINSON APPEARED <br />IN REGARD TO CREATING A TAXING DISTRICT FOR.LAURELWOOD HOMES SUBDIVISION. <br />MR. ROBINSON EXPLAINED THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO PUT IN STREET LIGHTS AND <br />WOULD EITHER LIKE TO ESTABLISH A TAXING DISTRICT OR A PROPERTY OWNER'S <br />ASSOCIATION, BUT FELT A TAXING DISTRICT WOULD WORK MORE EFFICIENTLY, HE <br />STATED THAT THE FIRST UNIT WOULD HAVE 5$ LOTS AND THE COST TO THE HOME OWNER <br />FOR TEN STREET LIGHTS WOULD BE $11.01 PER HOME OWNER PER YEAR PLUS $1.00 <br />FOR ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS. THE LIGHTS !COULD BE INSTALLED BY FLORIDA POWER AND <br />LIGHT AT THE EXPENSE OF LAURELWOOD HOMES, AND THEY "IOULD LIKE THE COUNTY TO <br />SET UP A TAXING DISTRICT FOR MAINTENANCE COSTS AND CURRENT, THEY ALSO WOULD <br />LIKE TO HAVE THIS APPROVED SEFORE THEY BEGIN SELLING LOTS, <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT QUESTIONED WHETHER THIS MUST BE DONE BY ORDINANCE <br />AND WOULD REQUIRE AN ORDINANCE. <br />MR. ROBINSON PRESENTED A LETTER AND SUGGESTED RESOLUTION DRAWN UP <br />BY ATTORNEY BOGOSIAN, WHICH HE SAID ATTORNEY COLLINS HAD SEEN, AND STATED <br />THAT IN THIS RESOLUTION THE TAXING DISTRICT WAS SET UP WITHOUT AN ELECTION. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT THIS INFORMATION WAS BROUGHT TO THE <br />BOARD TODAY FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND WAS TO BE FORMALLY REQUESTED <br />AT ANOTHER MEETING. HE SUGGESTED THE BOARD RECEIVE THIS INFORMATION FOR RE- <br />VIEW AND PUT IT ON THE AGENDA FOR THE NEXT MEETING, <br />MR, ROBINSON COMMENTED THAT AS THE SUBDIVISION GROWS, THEY WILL <br />WANT TO AMEND THE RESOLUTION TO ADD MORE STREET LIGHTS. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED WE INSTRUCT THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO CON- <br />FER WITH PROPERTY APPRAISER FLETCHER ABOUT THIS AND ASK FOR HIS COMMENTS, <br />IT WAS AGREED TO REFER MR. BOGOSIAN'S LETTER AND -SUGGESTED RESOLU- <br />TION TO MR. FLETCHER FOR HIS COMMENTS BEFORE THE NEXT MEETING, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS RETURNED TO THE MEETING AT 11:05 O'CLOCK A.M. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT THE RESOLUTION STATES THAT $1.00 <br />A LOT SHALL BE ADDED BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, <br />AND HE WOULD LIKE THE ATTORNEY'S THOUGHTS ON THIS AS HE WAS CONCERNED THAT <br />$1.00 PER LOT MIGHT NOT COVER THESE COSTS. <br />4150 <br />JAN 211976 `. <br />erVwt 24 pv; E-446 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.