Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
L- <br />A MEMORANDUM FROM VAL BRENNAN'S OFFICE DATED .JANUARY 15,1976 <br />REGARDING ASSIGNING STREET NAMES AND NUMBERS WAS DISCUSSED AND THE COUNTY <br />ADMINISTRATOR SUGGESTED THAT HE -WORK WITH MR. BRENNAN TO CLARIFY ASSIGNMENT <br />OF STREET NUMBERS AND NAMES, <br />THE BOARD THEN DISCUSSED THE WORK BEING REQUESTED OF THE PLANNING <br />DEPARTMENT BY THE CHARTER COMMISSION. <br />MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT THE TIME NECESSARY TO DO THE WORK REUQESTED <br />IS A PROBLEM ALONG WITH THE FACT THAT THERE ARE ONLY FOUR EMPLOYEES IN THE <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT. <br />THE BOARD AGREED THAT THE CHARTER COMMISSION.REQUESTS SHOULD <br />CARRY PRIORITY AND RECOMMENDED THAT MR. BRENNAN DISCUSS THIS WITH THE <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR. <br />THE BOARD RECESSED AT 12:00 O'CLOCK NOON AND RECONVENED AT 1:30 <br />O'CLOCK P.M. <br />RICHARD P. BOGOSIAN, ATTORNEY REPRESENTING LAUREL HOMES, INC. <br />APPEARED REGARDING THE CREATION OF -A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT FOR STREET <br />LIGHTS IN THE LAURELWOOD SUBDJVISION UNIT 1. <br />MR. BOGOSIAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE COST PER LOT FOR STREET <br />LIGHTS WILL BE $10.31.• THERE WILL BE NO COST TO THE COUNTY OTHER THAN <br />ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, WHICH COULD BE PASSED ON TO THE CUSTOMER. HE <br />CONTINUED THAT ORANGE COUNTY IS USING A FIGURE OF $1.00 FOR ADMINISTRATIVE <br />COSTS, <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT QUESTIONED WHY THIS IS NOT BEING DONE BY A <br />COVENANT, <br />MR. BOGOSIAN STATED THAT WITH A COVENANT, IF A RESIDENT DID NOT <br />PAY HIS BILL, THE OTHER RESIDENTS WOULD HAVE TO PAY IT. <br />MR. BOGOSIAN CONTINUED THAT IN A TAXING DISTRICT, FLORIDA POWER <br />AND LIGHT WILL PUT UP THE FACILITIES AT NO.CHARGE TO THE DEVELOPER. EACH <br />PROPERTY OWNER WILL BE TREATED EQUALLY BECAUSE ALL THE HOMES WILL BE BASICALLY <br />IN THE SAME PRICE RANGE. A PER LOT CHARGE WILL PROBABLY BE THE BEST WAY <br />TO GO RATHER THAN A MILLAGE RATE, <br />THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE ADMINISTRATIVE COST OF $1.00. <br />MR. BOGOSIAN•STATED THAT HE FEELS $1.00 FOR ADMINISTRATIVE COST <br />PROBABLY WILL NOT BE SUFFICIENT, BUT THE BOARD CAN CHARGE WHAT THEY FEEL <br />IS ADEQUATE, MR. BOGOSIAN CONTINUED THAT THE $10.31 CHARGE IS ESTABLISHED <br />BY THE PUBLIC UTILITY BOARD. <br />®20- <br />ox 25 U9 <br />r <br />