Laserfiche WebLink
• i <br />i <br />RESOLUTION N0, 76-12 <br />STATE OF FLORIDA <br />COUNTY RESOLUTION ON USE <br />OF <br />SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS <br />YEAR 1976 COUNTY Indian River <br />v <br />WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 206.47, Florida Statutes <br />and Section 9°, Article XII Constitution of the State of Florida, the <br />Florida Departmert of Transportation will receive a portion of the surplus <br />of this County's pro -rata share of the 5th and 6th cent gasoline tax to be <br />used within this County; and <br />WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 339.08 and Section 339.081, <br />Florida Statutes, the expenditure of such funds shall be as prescribed by <br />regulations of the Department and pursuant to an adopted resolution by this <br />Board of County Commissioners; and <br />WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 334.21, Florida Statutes, <br />the County is required to submit to the Department of Transportation a ,plan <br />of work for the construction and maintenance of roads and streets within its <br />jurisdiction for the five-year period beginning 1976 <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: <br />1. That the Florida Department of Transportation is hereby re- <br />quested to use the aforesaid funds for the purposes and projects listed <br />in EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof and that the Department <br />consider the listed items in accordance with priorities shown and to the <br />i <br />extent of available funds in the preparation of its annual program of work <br />for the above -listed fiscal year with the remaining requests constituting a <br />i continuing program to be scheduled in accordance with estimated available funds <br />during the succeeding four years. <br />2. That the actual scheduling of work by the Department on the re- <br />quested projects be in the order of priorities listed insofar as is practicable, <br />but not to the extent of retarding the whole program or precluding the grouping <br />of similar type projects in one construction contract. <br />3. That allocations and expenditures of funds by the Department <br />shall not be restricted by an estimate of cost shown herein, and that' <br />FB 18 1976BOOR PaG 67 <br />