Laserfiche WebLink
COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF ATTORNEY SUTHERLAND COULD GIVE <br />THE BOARD A FIGURE HIS CLIENT WOULD ACCEPT IF THEY KEPT THE BURDEN OF <br />THE THIRD PARTY INTEREST AS HE FELT THE COUNTY IS AT A DISADVANTAGE <br />NOT KNOWING WHAT IT WILL COST TO SETTLE THIS. <br />ATTORNEY SUTHERLAND POINTED OUT THAT THERE IS A CLAUSE THAT <br />IF YOU CAN'T DO THIS SATISFACTORILY WITHIN 30 DAYS, YOU CAN CANCEL, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED HE THOUGHT THE SELLER WAS IN A BETTER <br />POSITION TO KNOW WHAT PROBLEMS WERE INVOLVED, AND HE WOULD NOT WANT TO <br />HAVE SOMEONE APPEAR WITHIN A FEW YEARS THAT WE DON'T KflOW ABOUT WITHOUT <br />HAVING AN INDEMNIFICATION FROM THE GALE GROUP. <br />ATTORNEY SUTHERLAND REMARKED THAT THIS IS WHERE THE IMPASSE IS. <br />MY CLIENTS DON'T KNOW EITHER AND THEY ARE PASSING ON TO YOU WHAT THEY <br />HAVE SECURED, <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED IF THIS ALL STARTED WITH PEBBLE <br />BAY? <br />ATTORNEY SUTHERLAND SAID IT DID AND THAT THERE HAVE BEEN HALF <br />A DOZEN ATTORNEYS INVOLVED WITH IT OVER THE YEARS, <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER SAID HE FELT IF IT ALL STARTED WITH <br />PEBBLE BAY, THEN IT MIGHT NOT BE T00 HARD TO WORK WITHâ–º <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT THE FRANCHISE WAS GRANTED <br />TO A.NOW DISSOLVED CORPORATION. I <br />COMMISSIONER MASSEY RETURNED TO THE MEETING AT 10:55 O'CLOCK A.M. <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED AS TO WHICH PARTY WAS BETTER ABLE TO <br />ASSUME THE BURDEN OF RESOLVING THE PROBLEMS INVOLVED. <br />ATTORNEY SUTHERLAND STATED THAT HIS GROUP WOULDN'T MIND <br />WORKING WITH THE PROBLEMS, BUT IF IT COSTS MONEY, THEN IT IS YOUR PROBLEM <br />BECAUSE WE ARE SELLING THE PROPERTY AS IS, AND ARE WILLING TO GIVE YOU <br />AN "OUT" WITH THE 30 -DAY CLAUSE. HE SUGGESTED WRITING A CONTRACT WITH <br />EITHER PARTY BEING ABLE TO CANCEL, <br />I <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THERE WILL DEFINITELY BE SOME FINANCIAL <br />QUESTIONS INVOLVED WITH THE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, <br />16 <br />MAR 10 1976 <br />122 <br />