Laserfiche WebLink
t. NAME OF APPLICANT <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY <br />(OTHER NEEDS HAVING A PARTICULAR URGENCY) <br />2. APPLICATION NUMBER 3. W ORIGINAL <br />r•'1 a aMnRAFIJT <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1 <br />4. PROGRAM YEAR (Ent'riemenr IWPI-11- v.,,r, <br />FROM: 7/1/76 To: 6/30/77 <br />k•4. NEED FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT A14D FACILITIES NECESSARY AND <br />APPROPRIATE TO THE CONSERVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF SPECIFIC NEIGHBORHOODS. <br />ae Many neighborhoods in the unincorporated County, and especially those areas of <br />deteriorated or deteriorating housing quality, require such improvements as <br />street paving, curbs and gutters, street lighting, sidewalks and street drainage <br />in order to maintain or return these areas to long-term sound condition. <br />b. Particularly detrimental in areas of lower income households and substandard <br />housing is the lack. of paved streets and proper drainage, which health hazards <br />and related blighting influences tend to inhibit normal maintenance efforts as <br />well as private incentive to up -grade the housing and the neighborhood <br />environments. _ <br />c. The Neighborhood Analysis of 1972 cited Enumeration Districts 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, <br />45, 46, 49, 51 and 52 as being inadequate in all of the following public im- <br />provements/facilities: <br />(1) Sidewalks. <br />2) Street lights. <br />(3 Paved streets. <br />4 Storm drainage. <br />(5 Recreation facilities. <br />Data Source: Analysis of Neighborhood Study Areas, 1972 Vero Beach/IRC Planning <br />Commission <br />A-5. PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT <br />This program has developed a closer working relationship between community <br />leaders of Gifford/Wabasso areas, representatives of the Citizen Committee and <br />the County administration and County Commission. It has, in addition, created <br />responsibilities between the members of the Citizens Committee and the people <br />they represent because the latter groups are asking why improvements are being <br />made in some areas and not others. The Citizens Committee is expl <br />graining the <br />year-to-year program and how decisions are being made by the Committee and <br />Administration. <br />It is interesting that other individuals (and groups) not usually interested <br />in area improvements in the past are now taking more interest now that they <br />have seen actual improvements taking place on the ground. <br />The need for the coming year is to expand this involvement and intercommunica- <br />tions. I <br />af. some: Admi <br />HUD -7015.2A.(11-75) <br />• <br />z -, <br />. <br />t. NAME OF APPLICANT <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY <br />(OTHER NEEDS HAVING A PARTICULAR URGENCY) <br />2. APPLICATION NUMBER 3. W ORIGINAL <br />r•'1 a aMnRAFIJT <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1 <br />4. PROGRAM YEAR (Ent'riemenr IWPI-11- v.,,r, <br />FROM: 7/1/76 To: 6/30/77 <br />k•4. NEED FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT A14D FACILITIES NECESSARY AND <br />APPROPRIATE TO THE CONSERVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF SPECIFIC NEIGHBORHOODS. <br />ae Many neighborhoods in the unincorporated County, and especially those areas of <br />deteriorated or deteriorating housing quality, require such improvements as <br />street paving, curbs and gutters, street lighting, sidewalks and street drainage <br />in order to maintain or return these areas to long-term sound condition. <br />b. Particularly detrimental in areas of lower income households and substandard <br />housing is the lack. of paved streets and proper drainage, which health hazards <br />and related blighting influences tend to inhibit normal maintenance efforts as <br />well as private incentive to up -grade the housing and the neighborhood <br />environments. _ <br />c. The Neighborhood Analysis of 1972 cited Enumeration Districts 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, <br />45, 46, 49, 51 and 52 as being inadequate in all of the following public im- <br />provements/facilities: <br />(1) Sidewalks. <br />2) Street lights. <br />(3 Paved streets. <br />4 Storm drainage. <br />(5 Recreation facilities. <br />Data Source: Analysis of Neighborhood Study Areas, 1972 Vero Beach/IRC Planning <br />Commission <br />A-5. PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT <br />This program has developed a closer working relationship between community <br />leaders of Gifford/Wabasso areas, representatives of the Citizen Committee and <br />the County administration and County Commission. It has, in addition, created <br />responsibilities between the members of the Citizens Committee and the people <br />they represent because the latter groups are asking why improvements are being <br />made in some areas and not others. The Citizens Committee is expl <br />graining the <br />year-to-year program and how decisions are being made by the Committee and <br />Administration. <br />It is interesting that other individuals (and groups) not usually interested <br />in area improvements in the past are now taking more interest now that they <br />have seen actual improvements taking place on the ground. <br />The need for the coming year is to expand this involvement and intercommunica- <br />tions. I <br />af. some: Admi <br />HUD -7015.2A.(11-75) <br />Planninq Director, -and <br />�l <br />issioner <br />2 of Pepes <br />4 <br />1 <br />Book <br />s j <br />. <br />i <br />1 <br />Vit• <br />d ' <br />o; <br />i 91976.` <br />i Y <br />� <br />l <br />l <br />Planninq Director, -and <br />�l <br />issioner <br />2 of Pepes <br />4 <br />1 <br />Book <br />s j <br />