Laserfiche WebLink
75 <br />« J' <br />f s <br />i <br />' <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED ON THE MERITS OF THE ACROSS-THE-BOARD <br />E <br />l <br />1 <br />INCREASE AS OPPOSED TO A MERIT INCREASE, AND THE STEP INCREASE PROCEDURE <br />WAS REVIEWED, <br />VARIOUS PERCENTAGES WERE SUGGESTED, AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT <br />STATED THP.T HE WOULD LIKE TO HOLD THE DEPARTMENTAL INCREASE TO 6% BUT <br />ALLOW SOME LATITUDE IN THE MERIT INCREASES. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE SAID THAT HE COULD AGREE WITH THE 5% <br />AND 4% BUT COULD NOT GO ALONG WITH A TOTAL EXCEEDING MORE THAN 71021. <br />AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, <br />SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RE <br />FOLLOWING TO BE USED AS A GUIDE AND NOT AS A COMMITMENT IN PREPARING <br />1976-77 BUDGETS:, AN ACROSS-THE-BOARD SALARY INCREASE OF 51'al, PLUS, <br />WHERE APPLICABLE, A MERIT INCREASE OF UP TO 47 FOR THOSE NOT HAVING <br />A STEP INCREASE PROGRAM; THE TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES FOR ANY AGENCY <br />OR DEPARTMENT NOT TO EXCEED 77. OVER LAST YEARS SALARIES AND WAGES. <br />} <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD RECEIVED <br />FROM THE D.O.T. A NEW RESOLUTION AND CONTRACT IN REGARD TO INDIAN RIVER <br />BOULEVARD REPLACING RESOLUTION 72-28 AND THE CONTRACT EXECUTED IN 1972 <br />AS THE FORMAT ON THEM WAS OUTDATED, <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0, 76-41 AND <br />AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTRACT <br />IN REGARD TO INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD, SECTION 88501-2601. <br />75 <br />