My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/23/1976
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1976
>
6/23/1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:19 AM
Creation date
6/9/2015 4:31:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/23/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THEIR ERRORS, HE STATED THAT, ESPECIALLY WITH THE POSITION WE ARE IN, <br />BEING BETWEEN TWO DIFFERENT DISTRICTS AND TRANSFERRING FROM ONE TO ANOTHER, <br />HE IS IN FAVOR OF AS MUCH STUDY AS POSSIBLE, <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE CANNOT SUPPORT THE MOTION AS <br />IT SEEMS PRETTY CLEAR THAT THE RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE UPPER ST. .JOHNS <br />RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GOES BACK TO A PLAN FOUND UNACCEPTABLE <br />BY THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT WE WORKED WITH FOR MANY YEARS, AND 'T DOES <br />NOT ADDRESS OUR PROBLEMS IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM. HE FURTHER STATED <br />THAT IF THE CORPS THOUGHT ANOTHER STUDY WERE JUSTIFIED, HE FEELS THEY <br />WOULD HAVE INITIATED IT THEMSELVES. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER NOTED THAT HE ATTENDED A FLOOD CONTROL <br />MEETING ABOUT SIX MONTHS AGO AND UNDERSTOOD FROM THE CORPS AT THAT TIME <br />THAT THEY WERE SO TIRED OF ALL THIS STUDY, IT WAS ALMOST A DEAD ISSUE <br />WITH THEM. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD HATE TO SEE THE PLAN PUT IN LIMBO BUT <br />. DOES FEEL IT HAS BEEN STUDIED TO DEATH OVER THE LAST 20 YEARS, AND IT IS <br />VERY DISCOURAGING AT THIS POINT TO BE TRANSFERRED INTO A NEW DISTRICT. <br />COMMISS?ONER LOY ASKED AT THIS POINT, FOR PURPOSE OF CLARIFICA- <br />TION, IF THE 1.5 MILLION DOLLAR PROJECT WILL ALLOW US TO HOLD ON TO OUR <br />WATER IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. <br />SIR. MILES STATED THAT THIS, PROJECT WILL HAVE VERY LITTLE EFFECT ON <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EXCEPT AS IT AFFECTS THE WATER UPSTREAM, HE CONTINUED <br />THAT THE CORPS IS WILLING TO REASON ON ANY MODIFICATIONS, BUT HAVE MADE <br />IT PERFECTLY CLEAR WHAT THEIR PLAN IS, AND HE, THEREFORE, QUESTIONS THE <br />$225,OOO REQUESTED FOR FURTHER STUDIES. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. COMMISSIONER MASSEY VOTED <br />IN FAVOR, AND COMMISSIONERS WODTKE, LOY AND SCHMUCKER, AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT` <br />VOTED IN OPPOSITION. THE MOTION WAS DENIED. <br />; <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER WODTKE, TO INDICATE THE BOARD IS OPPOSED TO THE $225,OOO STUDY <br />REQUESTED IN PROJECT #RE76-29 AND WISH TO SHOW THEIR CONCURRENCE WITH THE ;. <br />CORPS OF ENGINEERS"PLAN. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER NOTED THAT HIS COUNTY IS FRUSTRATED D <br />T FR TRATE AN <br />CANNOT HELP BUT BE SUSPICIOUS THAT THE WHOLE PLAN MIGHT BE CHANGED AGAIN. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.