Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT REPORTED THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A LETTER FROM <br />N'. H. BRAATZ, OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH U0 REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, <br />ENCLOSING AN AGREEMENT IN REGARD TO FUNDING FOR A MEDICAL EXAMINER PROGRAM, <br />UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, THE COUNTY WOULD BE GRANTED THE TOTAL SUM OF $7,650 <br />TO BE ALLOCATED QUARTERLY IN THE SUM OF <br />AFTER DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED TO TURN THIS OVER TO ATTORNEY <br />EVANS TO REVIEW AND REPORT ON LATER IN THE MEETING. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD PARTICIPATED <br />IN A JOINT MEETING WITH OFFICIALS FROM POLK AND OSCEOLA COUNTIES IN REGARD <br />TO THE FOUR-LANING OF ROUTE 60 AND THE POSSIBILITY OF GETTING IT ON A <br />HIGHER PRIORITY WITH THE D.O.T. HE NOTED -THAT ONE OF THE MAIN PROBLEMS <br />IS THAT EACH OF THE THREE COUNTIES IS IN A DIFFERENT D.O.T. DISTRICT. <br />HE CONTINUED THAT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IS IN VERY GOOD SHAPE AS FAR AS <br />RIGHTS OF WAY ARE CONCERNED, AND NOTED, AS A MATTER OF INTEREST, THAT POLK <br />COUNTY HAS COMMITTED THEIR SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS UP UNTIL 1984 TO THE OB- <br />TAINING OF RIGHTS OF WAY FOR THIS PROJECT. HE STATED THERE WILL BE ANOTHER <br />MEETING IN SEPTEMBER, BUT THE GENERAL CONSENSUS IS THAT THIS PROJECT WILL <br />NOT COME ABOUT BEFORE THE MID 1980`S. COMMISSIONER WODTKE CONTINUED THAT <br />IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THE MOST EXPENSIVE PART OF WIDENING ROUTE 60 WOULD BE <br />IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND SAID HE HAD INFORMED THE OTHERS THAT HE FELT <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WOULD NOT STALL THIS PROJECT BEING CARRIED OUT IN THE <br />OTHER COUNTIES EVEN IF WE SHOULD BE THE LAST SECTION TO BE DONE. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE NEXT DISCUSSED FUNDING FOR THE "911" EMER- <br />GENCY COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM AND NOTED THAT HOUSE BILL #3452 RELATING TO <br />THIS HAS NOW PASSED AND STATES THAT THE COUNTIES DO NOT HAVE TO IMPLEMENT <br />THE "911" SYSTEM UNLESS MONIES ARE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE LEGISLATURE FOR <br />'IMPLEMENT TION AND MAINTENANCE." HE STATED THAT WE HAVE BEEN APPROVED FOR <br />SOME MONEY (AT LEAST $13,000), BUT DO NOT REALLY KNOW WHAT IT IS FOR OR <br />WHETHER THIS MEANS WE HAVE TO GO AHEAD OR NOT, HE FELT, HOWEVER, SOME- <br />THING SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE BUDGET FOR THIS EVENTUALITY AND ESTIMATED <br />THE COST WOULD PROBABLY BE ABOUT $75,000. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE WOULD NOT BE AVERSE TO INCLUD- <br />ING A NOMINAL AMOUNT IN THE BUDGET FOR THIS PURPOSE, WHICH COULD BE CARRIED <br />OVER, IF NECESSARY. <br />23 <br />nf4 Z6 E I. <br />