My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/18/1976
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1976
>
8/18/1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:19 AM
Creation date
6/9/2015 4:36:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/18/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT SOME OFFICIALS <br />OF THE D.O.T. WOULD LIKE TO MEET WITH MEMBERS OF THE BOARD IN THE COMMISSION <br />ROOM NEXT TUESDAY, AUGUST 24TH, AT 3:00 O'CLOCK P.M. FOR AN INFORMAL DIS- <br />CUSSION. i <br />VICE CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT DUE TO AN ARTICLE APPEARING IN <br />THE NEWSPAPERS FOLLOWING THE JOINT MEETING BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERO 'EACH, <br />THE COUNTY AND THE D.O.T., HE FELT WE SHOULD DO A SHORT RECAP OF THE COUNTY'S <br />UNDERSTANDING AS TO THE RELOCATION OF UTILITIES FOR THE 17T1• STREET RRIDRE, <br />SPECIFICALLY AS TO OUR AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY, AND REQUESTED THAT COMMIS- <br />SIONER•LOY GIVE SUCH A RECAP. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY EXPLAINED THAT THE COUNTY WAS GIVEN TO UNDERSTAND <br />THAT THERE WERE UTILITIES THAT NEEDED TO BE MOVED IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A <br />BRIDGE AT 17TH STREET AND WERE INFORMED THAT THE CITY OF VERO BEACH DID NOT <br />FEEL THEY SHOULD BEAR THE ENTIRE RESPONSIBILITY OF MOVING THESE UTILITIES, <br />NOR DID THEY HAVE ENOUGH FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO S0, THE COUNTY, IN ORDER TO <br />ENSURE THE CITIZENS OF THIS AREA THAT WE WOULD HAVE A BRIDGE AT 17TH STREET, <br />PLEDGED THAT CERTAIN MONIES BE MADE AVAILABLE IN ORDER TO ASSIST WITH THE <br />MOVING OF THESE UTILITIES. SHE NOTED THAT THE MOVING OF THE UTILITIES WILL <br />BE BASED ON CONTRACTS WHICH WILL BE LET FOR THIS PURPOSE ONLY. SHE EMPHA- <br />SIZED THAT THE COUNTY DID SAY IT WOULD PLEDGE "�� $390,000 OF ITS <br />SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS TOWARDS THIS PURPOSE. COMMISSIONER LOY CONTINUED THAT <br />THE ESTIMATES PRESENTED IN ROUND FIGURES AT THE RECENT MEETING RAN CONSID- <br />ERABLY OVER WHAT WE HAD ANTICIPATED, AND WE DID SUGGEST THAT THE CITY ENGIN- <br />EERS GO BACK AND GET EXACT ESTIMATES IMMEDIATELY, WHICH ESTIMATES AND SPECI- <br />FICATIONS WILL BE THOROUGHLY CHECKED BY THE D.O.T. TO BE SURE THEY MEET ALL <br />OF THEIR REQUIREMENTS. WHEN THIS IS DONE, WE WILL THEN MAKE A FINAL DECI- <br />SION ON EXACTLY WHAT AMOUNT OF FUNDS WILL HAVE TO BE INVOLVED. COMMISSIONER <br />LOY REITERATED THAT AN AMOUNT UP TO $390,000 OF THE SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS IS <br />THE ONLY FIGURE WE EVER PLEDGED, AND THE CITY OF VERO BEACH INDICATED THEY <br />WOULD RELEASE THE DEED FOR THE RIGHT OF WAY TO THE 17TH STREET BRIDGE, BUT <br />NOT IN LIEU OF PAYMENT OF MONIES. ANY MONEY WE PAY WILL BE BASED ON THE <br />CONTRACTS THAT ARE LET, <br />e <br />34 _- <br />�rfulr 6 '�ano ur, <br />aY' <br />r. <br />t- <br />34 _- <br />�rfulr 6 '�ano ur, <br />aY' <br />r. <br />t- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.