My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/19/1976
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1976
>
10/19/1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:20 AM
Creation date
6/10/2015 4:29:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/19/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND THE BOARD AGREED THE SCHOOL SITE WAS <br />THE ONE TO PURSUE. <br />HOMER FLETCHER, PROPERTY APPRAISER, APPEARED AND INFORMED THE <br />BOARD THAT HE HAS COLLECTED THE OUTSTANDING COMMISSIONS DUE HIS OFFICE <br />FOR THE YEAR 1973 AND PRESENTED TO THE BOARD A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF <br />$143,271.00 REPRESENTING THEIR PORTION OF THE EXCESS FEES, <br />DON ADAMS, CITY -COUNTY BUILDING DIRECTOR, APPEARED TO DISCUSS <br />WITH THE BOARD A CHANGE IN CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMITS IN REGARD TO <br />BUILDING DOCKS. HE STATED HE HAS REVIEWED INFORMATION FROM THE CORPS <br />OF ENGINEERS WHICH SEEMS TO INDICATE CERTAIN PERMITS WILL NO LONGER BE <br />NECESSARY. MR. ADAMS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WE DO NOT HAVE ANY <br />CRITERIA FOR SMALL RESIDENTIAL DOCKS IN THE COUNTY. <br />ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS NOTED THAT PERMITS TO CONSTRUCT SUCH <br />DOCKS MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL GOVERNMENTAL REGULATORY AGENCIES, <br />MR. ADAMS STATED THAT WE NEED A SET OF LOCAL REGULATIONS AND <br />FELT SOME GUIDELINES SHOULD BE SET UP, HE FELT IT WILL HELP LOCAL PEOPLE <br />NOT TO HAVE TO SEND OFF TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT THIS MATTER SHOULD BE FORWARDED <br />TO THE ZONING DEPARTMENT TO WORK WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ON SUCH <br />REGULATIONS AND THEN THEY SHOULD FORWARD A FINAL DRAFT TO THE BUILDING <br />DIRECTOR TO REVIEW BEFORE IT IS BROUGHT TO THE BOARD AGAIN. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS ASKED IF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS IS <br />RELIEVING THEMSELVES OF THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF WHAT THEY NOW DO IN THE <br />PERMITTING PROCESS REQUIRED ON ANY DOCK. HE NOTED THESE PERMITS ARE <br />SENT BY THE CORPS TO VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES, I.E., THE TRUSTEES <br />OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND AND THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL <br />REGULATION, AND ASKED IF WE DO WHAT IS BEING DISCUSSED HERE, WILL IT BE <br />A RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY TO CONTACT ALL THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL <br />AGENCIES. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INSTRUCTED INTERGOVERN- <br />MENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS TO INVESTIGATE THIS FACET OF THE MATTER BEFORE <br />IT IS SENT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENTS TO SET UP LOCAL <br />REGULATIONS. <br />BUILDING DIRECTOR ADAMS THEN REPORTED TO THE BOARD ON THE <br />BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE AND STATED THAT, ON THE PART OF THE COUNTY, <br />THE FEE SCHEDULE IS SUFFICIENT AND SELF-SUPPORTING AND THE COUNTY <br />CLEARED, $716.00 FOR THE LAST FISCAL YEAR. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE <br />23 <br />T 2 01976 s -27 <br />Nd.s103 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.