Laserfiche WebLink
ATTORNEY .JACKSON STATED THAT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE BUYING THIS <br />PROPERTY ARE HERE AND HAVE SAID THEY WILL AGREE TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THEY REALLY NEED TO AGREE TO B-1 <br />ZONING AS SITE PLAN APPROVAL WOULD NOT BE BINDING IN C -IA ZONING. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF IT IS THE INTENTION OF THE BUYER TO <br />COME BACK AND ASK FOR B-1 ZONING. <br />MARK FALB, SECRETARY OF RALMAR ASSOCIATES, INC., APPEARED AND <br />INFORMED THE EOARD THAT THE REASON THEY CHANGED FROM B -I TO C -IA HAS TO <br />DO WITH NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE WHICH REQUIRES DOCTORS TO FUNCTION IN <br />A GROUP, THEIR CLUSTER DESIGN IS FOR INDIVIDUAL OFFICES AT THIS TIME. <br />MR. FALB CONTINUED THAT THE PRIMARY DIFFERENCE IN B-1 ZONING THAT WOULD <br />AFFECT THEM IS THAT B-1 REQUIRES A 75' SETBACK OFF MAJOR THROUGHWAYS, AND <br />A SETBACK OF 75' ON EACH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY WOULD PRESENT A PROBLEM. HE <br />ALSO WOULD NOT WANT TO CREATE A NON -CONFORMING USE FOR SOME POINT IN TIME <br />AND THUS WOULD PREFER C-lA ZONING. HE NOTED THAT IF THE SETBACK WERE ON <br />ONE ROAD OR THE OTHER IT WOULD BE NO PROBLEM. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND THE BOARD AGREED THAT THE 75' SETBACK <br />WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED ON THE ROAD LEADING INTO THE HOSPITAL AS IT IS NOT <br />A MAJOR THROUGHWAY BUT JUST A ROAD LEADING INTO A FACILITY, <br />MR. FALB STATED WITH THAT ASSURANCE AND THE ASSURANCE THAT <br />MEDICAL CLINICS WILL BE ALLOWED IN B-1, HE WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION TO <br />,THE B-1 ZONING, BUT CONTINUED THAT C-lA WOULD PROVIDE THEM WITH MORE <br />FLEXIBILITY AND HE WOULD RATHER HAVE IT WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT <br />THEY WOULD ENLIST THE HELP OF MR. BRENNAN AND MR. BERG IN THE SITE PLANS <br />I1;l:mll:kvl4Klm <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED IN REGARD TO SETBACKS REQUIRED, AND <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT C -1A ONLY REQUIRES A 10' SETBACK AND WE <br />WILL NEED 55' FOR THE ROAD, <br />MR. FALB POINTED OUT THAT INCLUDING THEIR PARKING LOT, THEY ARE <br />SET BACK 95'. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED THAT PARKING LOTS, LANDSCAPING AND SIGNS <br />CAN BE INCLUDED IN SETBACK AREAS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED IF THE NECESSARY RIGHT-OF-WAY WOULD <br />INTERFER WITH THEIR PRESENT PLANS, AND MR. FALB STATED THAT IT WOULD NOT. <br />33 <br />OCT 2 01976 s 7 `Q�� .13 <br />