My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/5/1976
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1976
>
11/5/1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:20 AM
Creation date
6/10/2015 4:31:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/05/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT.INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ATTORNEY COLLINS HAS <br />ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY IN REGARD TO THE <br />CORRIDOR FOR THE 17TH STREET BRIDGE WHICH HE WISHES TO HAVE ADDED TO TO- <br />DAY'S AGENDA. <br />-ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, <br />THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADDED THE ABOVE EMERGENCY ITEM TO THE AGENDA AS RE- <br />QUESTED BY ATTORNEY COLLINS, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD A REVISED DRAFT OF THE <br />NROPOSED AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND COUNTY IN REGARD TO THE CORRIDOR <br />FOR THE 17TH STREET BRIDGE. HE STATED THAT THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY <br />ATTORNEY REVIEWED THE DRAFT PRESENTED TO THE BOARD AT THE MEETING OF <br />NOVEMBER 3RD AND MADE SOME SUGGESTIONS, WHICH HE HAS NOW INCORPORATED INTO <br />THE AGREEMENT WHERE HE THOUGHT IT WAS IN THE COUNTY'S INTEREST TO DO S0, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE FELT WE NOW HAVE A DOCUMENT THAT SHOULD BE <br />PALATABLE TO BOTH THE COUNTY AND THE CITY. HE NOTED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL <br />HAS NOT REVIEWED THIS DOCUMENT, AND HE WANTS TO CHECK A FEW POINTS WITH <br />THE DOT, BUT FEELS, IF THE BOARD DESIRES, THEY COULD AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR- <br />MAN TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AFTER THE CONCURRENCE OF THE ATTORNEY AND THE <br />ADMINISTRATOR. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE CITY WANTED A PARAGRAPH ADDED <br />IN REGARD TO SOME ITEMS THEY NEED TO GET ORDERED RIGHT AWAY AND THEY WANT <br />THE COST OF THESE ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED. .THIS IS COVERED IN PARAGRAPH <br />3 (A), AND HE SEES NO PROBLEM AS LONG AS THE DOT APPROVES, <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED IN REGARD TO THE REVISED AGREEMENT, AND <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT BECAUSE OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE TIME ELE- <br />MENT, HE WOULD LIKE TO FOLLOW THE SUGGESTION OF THE ATTORNEY AND GIVE <br />APPROVAL OF THIS AGREEMENT WHEREBY THE CHAIRMAN CAN SIGN IT SUBJECT TO THE <br />APPROVAL OF THE ATTORNEY AND THE ADMINISTRATOR, KNOWING THAT.THIS WILL BE <br />CHECKED OUT WITH THE DOT'S ATTORNEY. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT CHECKING WITH THE DOT'S ATTORNEY <br />WILL BE TIME-CONSUMING, AND IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT HE REVIEW IT WITH THE <br />DOT ATTORNEY BY TELEPHONE. <br />NV 6 1976 <br />s 27 -217 <br />a ^r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.