My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-058
CBCC
>
Resolutions
>
2000's
>
2003
>
2003-058
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 12:02:31 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 5:03:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
2003-058
Approved Date
05/20/2003
Resolution Type
Bonds
Entity Name
William R. Hough & Co.
Subject
General Obligation Refunding Bonds
Resolution 95-63
Archived Roll/Disk#
2746
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
2410
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
likely to be derived, and the evaluation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgements by <br />management. <br />Financial Statements and Annual Audit <br />Florida law requires that the financial statements of the County be audited on an annual basis. <br />Following the end of each fiscal year, a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (the "CAFR") is prepared <br />by the Finance Department of the County, under the supervision of the Clerk of the Circuit Court. <br />The basic financial statements, as well as the combining, individual fund, account group and <br />supporting financial statements of the County, (collectively the "Financial Statements") included in the <br />CAFR, are audited by an independent certified public accounting firm on an annual basis. The County <br />retains Harris, Cotherman & Associates, Vero Beach, Florida, for such services. The general purpose <br />financial statements of the County as of and for the year ended September 30, 2002, included in this <br />Official Statement, have been audited by Harris, Cotherman& Associates, independent auditors, as stated <br />in their report appearing herein as Appendix A. <br />REFERENDUM <br />The Bonds were approved by a referendum of the voters of the County held November 3, 1992. <br />LITIGATION <br />General <br />The County is a defendant from time to time in various lawsuits, including, in particular, litigation <br />related to zoning and other land use regulation matters. It is the opinion of the County Attorney that the <br />County has meritorious defenses against current pending litigation; provided, however, that there is no <br />assurance that the County will not incur some liability. <br />The Bonds <br />There is no pending or, to the knowledge of the County, threatened litigation against the County <br />which in any way questions or affects (1) the validity of the Bonds, or any proceedings or transactions <br />relating to their issuance, sale, delivery or payment; (2) the pledge of the Ad Valorem Taxes to secure <br />payment of the Bonds; or (3) the collection and application of the Ad Valorem Taxes in accordance with <br />the provisions of the Resolution. <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.