Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />F <br />PROBLEM WITH THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT AND THE STATE ATTORNEY AND BRING <br />BACK A REPORT. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED.THAT HE HAS RECEIVED A LETTER FROM <br />ONE OF THE UTILITY COMPANIES THAT IS HAVING DIFFICULTY WITH PRIVATE EASE- <br />MENTS, HE FELT THEY HAD RAISED A VALID POINT AND SUGGESTED THAT HE, <br />ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS, AND THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE GET TOGETHER <br />AND COME UP WITH SOME IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PLATTING ORDINANCE. <br />THE BOARD HAD NO OBJECTIONS, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT COUNTER PROPOSALS HAVE <br />BEEN MADE BY THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY THE COUNTY IS CONSIDERING FOR THE <br />LANDFILL SITE, THE RINKERS ARE ASKING $10,270 OVER THE APPRAISED VALUE <br />AND MR. WHALEN IS ASKING $21,645 OVER THE APPRAISED VALUE, WHICH WOULD BE <br />A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY $32,000 ABOVE THE APPRAISED VALUE, THE ATTORNEY <br />STATED THAT THESE COUNTER PROPOSALS CAN EITHER BE ACCEPTED OR REJECTED BY <br />THE BOARD, OR ANOTHER COUNTER OFFER STILL CAN BE MADE; IT IS A DISCRETION- <br />ARY DECISION. HE POINTED OUT, HOWEVER, THAT WITH THE TIME SCHED;,LE WE <br />ARE FACING_,; HE NEEDS SOME DIRECTION FROM THE BOARD TODAY. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy INQUIRED ABOUT THE COST OF A CONDEMNATION SUIT. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED HE COULD NOT GIVE A DEFINITE REPLY, BUT <br />FELT IT COULD BE IN THE SAME VICINITY AS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE COUNTER <br />PROPOSALS AND THE APPRAISED VALUE. <br />ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THE ENGINEERS ESTIMATE <br />'THAT THE DEADLINE FOR INITIATING AN ORDER OF TAKING WOULD BE NO LATER THAN <br />APRIL 28TH, AND NOTED THAT THE ATTORNEY WOULD NEED TIME TO GET THINGS IN <br />ORDER TO INITIATE THE ORDER OF TAKING. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER WAS CONCERNED THAT THE COUNTY COULD END <br />UP PAYING MORE THAN THE APPRAISED PRICE AND, IN ADDITION, WOULD HAVE TO PAY <br />ATTORNEYS FEES FOR BOTH SIDES. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED THAT, EVEN THOUGH SHE FEELS THE APPRAISED <br />PRICE IS MORE THAN FAIR, WE MIGHT BE MONEY AHEAD TO ACCEPT THE COUNTER <br />PROPOSALS. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT RINKERS COUNTER PROPOSAL IS 6% <br />ABOVE THE APPRAISED VALUE WHILE WHALEN's IS 10% ABOVE. HE SUGGESTED POSSI- <br />BLY ACCEPTING MR. RINKERS PROPOSAL AND MAKING A COUNTER OFFER TO MR. <br />WHALEN AT 6% ABOVE THE APPRAISED VALUE, <br />40 <br />MAR 2 3 197fig+►9 h <br />