Laserfiche WebLink
DECISION. HE NOTED THAT TODAY WILL BE THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING ON <br />THE REZONING REQUEST MADE BY MR. AND MRS, EDWARD STAILEY AND POINTED OUT <br />THAT UNDER THE NEW PROCEDURE, YOUR PROPERTY COULD BE REZONED WITHOUT ANY- <br />ON'E EVER KNOWING ABOUT IT, <br />Col'AISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF WE CAN CONTINUE TO ADVERTISE, AND THE <br />ATTORNEY STATED THAT WE COULD AND COULD ALSO CONTINUE TO ADVISE THE AD- <br />JACENT OR ABUTTING OWNERS, AND HE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT WE DO SO, <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN P.EGARD."TG THE LENGTH OF TIME THE NEW PROCE- <br />DURE WILL TAKE, AND IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT HOLIDAYS AND WEr.KENDS CANNOT <br />BE COUNTED IN THE 30 -DAY WAITING PERIOD, ONLY WORKING DAYS. THE PROBLEM <br />OF COORDINATING THIS TIMING -WITH THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION HEARING <br />WAS ALSO CONSIDERED. IT WAS AGREED THERE IS A NEED TO IMPROVE THIS PRO- <br />CEDURE. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED AFTER HOLDING THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND <br />THEN WAITING THE REQUIRED 30 DAYS TO MAKE A DECISION, IS IT NECESSARY <br />TO HOLD ANOTHER HEARING TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO SPEAK. <br />THE ATTORNEY STATED THAT THE ST17UTE IS QUITE NEBULOUS AND DOES NOT <br />ACTUALLY STATE THA„ BUT HE FELT IT SHOULD BE DONE THAT WAY, <br />THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK <br />READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE OF PUBLIC.HEARING, TO -WIT: <br />44 <br />APR o 1977 <br />